• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

N95 or Nanomask?

Re: N95 or Nanomask?

Birdfluwhispers - Are you a salesperson or do you obtain any income from the sale of masks, or are you related, in any way, whatsoever, to the above site?
 
Re: N95 or Nanomask?

I participate on this site out of concern about bird flu for myself, my family and my community. I view this site several times a day to stay abreast of what is going on. I have found this to be a very infomative and find the postings of Henry Niman to be insightful.

I do not post about subjects on any site that I have not thoroughly researched, espousing unsubstantiated opinion like some.

I have found the folk at adveticus to be very helpful when I have spoken to them. I think they have a good product in their respirators. If this site really is about the free sharing of information is there an issue with sharing that I think their product is good and that they are helpful and informative.

I have watched postings where I think (IMHO) people have flawed or incomplete logic and have felt moved to comment when appropriate.

If I have committed some offence in this please tell me. In the meantime I shall cease to post on this forum.

Maybe you could confirm that FluTracker.com is independant and not affiliated/supported by any organisations? Or name those that do support?
 
Re: N95 or Nanomask?

birdfluwhispers - I can confirm that FluTrackers and also H5N1Experts.org are independent and have been totally funded privately by me and Jeremy.

FluTrackers.com and H5N1Experts.org are not affiliated/supported by anyone but us.

See...that was not too hard. I am not offended by your question. Why were you offended by mine?
 
Re: N95 or Nanomask?

I would also like to add that everything contained within both sites is offered as a humanitarian gesture, free to the world.
 
Re: N95 or Nanomask?

I am not offended, I am disappointed and surprised that I have been singled out and had my motives questioned. Especially as I have seen so many blatant and not so blatant posts by people promoting their sites and goods on this and other sites

Have Robert or PKbarbie doll been asked their motives?

PKBARBIE doll has only ever posted twice both in this thread and opened this thread titled with a brand name. Now is that suspicious?

I am knowledgable about this subject and supplied a link to the site/company that helped me to gain some of that knowledge. I have bought Triosyn respirators for myself and family. I have mentioned this before, to buy masks in bulk is a resonable expense and I don't spend money without understanding the product.
 
Re: N95 or Nanomask?

Believe me...you have not been singled out. We question all links that directly link to a sales site.

To maintain our independence, we will not be sales representatives for any company.

Sorry you felt singled out.
 
Back
Top