• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

N Engl J Med. Older Age and a Reduced Likelihood of 2009 H1N1 Virus Infection

Giuseppe

Emeritus
Older Age and a Reduced Likelihood of 2009 H1N1 Virus Infection (NEJM, extract, edited)

Older Age and a Reduced Likelihood of 2009 H1N1 Virus Infection


To the Editor:

Early epidemiologic reports regarding the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus suggest that cases of infection and deaths are concentrated in adults between the ages of 20 and 40 years.1 This finding could reflect age-related differences in susceptibility or differential testing and diagnosis in this age group. Increased susceptibility to infection in young persons is characteristic of influenza pandemics and has important implications for disease-control policy.2 We examined whether the reported excess of cases in younger persons derives from testing practices or reflects a differential risk of infection in Ontario, Canada.

Our study sample included all persons who were tested for 2009 H1N1 virus infection under an enhanced, provincewide, laboratory-based surveillance regimen from April 20, 2009, to June 10, 2009. Patients with confirmed infection were compared with those who tested negative for the 2009 H1N1 virus. Using multivariate logistic regression and zero-inflated Poisson regression, we evaluated the association between age group (which was defined according to the relationship between birth year and the predominant circulating influenza strains) and the risk of infection with the 2009 H1N1 virus.

Of 11,560 patients who were tested, 1819 (15.7%) had positive results for the 2009 H1N1 virus. Persons who were born before 1957 had a reduced risk of infection, and estimates did not substantially change after adjustment for travel to Mexico, public health unit of residence, or calendar week (adjusted odds ratio for older age group, 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.18; unadjusted odds ratio; 0.17; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.21). Persons who were born between 1957 and 1975 were at intermediate risk for infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.48). Similar effects were seen in zero-inflated Poisson models that used testing volumes and population as model offsets. There was no significant relationship between age group and the risk of infection with seasonal influenza A viruses (either H3N2 or H1N1) (Figure 1).

(...)
-
<cite cite="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/361/20/2000">NEJM -- Older Age and a Reduced Likelihood of 2009 H1N1 Virus Infection</cite>
 

Attachments

Back
Top Bottom