• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

N Engl J Med. High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation on Shaky Ground

Giuseppe

Emeritus
[Source: The New England Journal of Medicine, full page: (LINK). Extract, edited.]

Editorial

High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation on Shaky Ground


Atul Malhotra, M.D., and Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D.

January 22, 2013 - DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe1300103



Article

We thought it was impossible. Physiological principles maintained that ventilation at tidal volumes less than the anatomical deadspace should be ineffective (i.e., inspired air not reaching the alveolae). Data from a 1980 study dispelled that myth, showing unequivocally that ventilation with tidal volumes as small as 20 to 30 ml in dogs, a mere fraction of the anatomical deadspace, could maintain adequate ventilation.1 These unexplained observations sparked transport and mixing theories predicting that CO<SUB>2</SUB> removal should vary in direct proportion to breathing frequency (although the relationship with tidal volume is more complex2,3), and these predictions were later confirmed experimentally.4 Subsequent studies showed that CO<SUB>2</SUB> removal eventually reaches a plateau when the airways narrow during expiration, indicating the onset of expiratory-flow limitation. This concept is important, since portions of the lung can become hyperinflated dynamically (i.e., regional air trapping) beyond levels predicted from the applied mean airway pressure.5-7

(?)
-
------
 
Back
Top Bottom