• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Much ado about flu: a mixed methods study of parental perceptions, trust and information seeking in a pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2018 Feb 13. doi: 10.1111/irv.12547. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Much ado about flu: a mixed methods study of parental perceptions, trust and information seeking in a pandemic.[/h] King CL[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Chow MYK[SUP]3[/SUP], Wiley KE[SUP]4[/SUP], Leask J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]5,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Effective public health messaging is essential in both the planning phase and duration of a pandemic.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] This study aimed to gain an understanding of parental information seeking, trusted sources and needs in relation to pandemic influenza A 2009 (pH1N1) to inform future policy planning and resource development.
[h=4]PATIENTS/METHODS:[/h] We conducted a mixed methods study; parents from 16 childcare centres in Sydney, Australia, were surveyed between 16 November and 9 December 2009 and interviews were conducted with participants from six childcare centres between June 2009 and May 2011.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] From 972 surveys distributed, 431 were completed; a response rate of 44%. Most parents (90%) reported that doctors were 'trusted a lot' as a source of influenza information, followed by nurses (59%), government (56%) and childcare centres (52%). Less trusted sources included media (7% selected 'trusted a lot'), anti-vaccination groups (6%) and celebrities (1%). Parents identified a range of key search terms for influenza infection and vaccine. From 42 in-depth interviews key themes were: 'Action trigger', 'In an emergency, think Emergency', 'Fright to hype' and 'Dr Google and beyond'. Parents relied heavily on media messages but cynicism emerged when the pandemic was milder than expected. Parents viewed a range of information sources as trustworthy, including doctors, authoritative hospital or government websites, and childcare centres and schools.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] A user-centred orientation is vital for pandemic communications including tailored information provision, via trusted sources based on what parents want to know and how they can find it. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Australia; Communication; Influenza; Pandemic; Parents; Trust

PMID: 29437291 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12547
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom