• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Meeting report: Convening on the influenza human viral challenge model for universal influenza vaccines, Part 1: Value; challenge virus selection; reg

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 14;37(35):4823-4829. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.080.
[h=1]Meeting report: Convening on the influenza human viral challenge model for universal influenza vaccines, Part 1: Value; challenge virus selection; regulatory, industry and ethical considerations; increasing standardization, access and capacity.[/h] Innis BL[SUP]1[/SUP], Berlanda Scorza F[SUP]2[/SUP], Blum JS[SUP]3[/SUP], Jain VK[SUP]4[/SUP], Older Aguilar A[SUP]5[/SUP], Post DJ[SUP]6[/SUP], Roberts PC[SUP]7[/SUP], Wairagkar N[SUP]4[/SUP], White J[SUP]8[/SUP], Bresee J[SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] In response to global interest in the development of a universal influenza vaccine, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, and the Global Funders Consortium for Universal Influenza Vaccine Development convened a meeting of experts (London, UK, May 2018) to assess the role of a standardized controlled human influenza virus infection model (CHIVIM) towards the development of novel influenza vaccine candidates. This report (in two parts) summarizes those discussions and offers consensus recommendations. This article (Part 1) covers challenge virus selection, regulatory and ethical considerations, and issues concerning standardization, access, and capacity. Part 2 covers specific methodologic considerations. Current methods for influenza vaccine development and licensure require large costly field trials. The CHIVIM requires fewer subjects and the controlled setting allows for better understanding of influenza transmission and host immunogenicity. The CHIVIM can be used to identify immune predictors of disease for at-risk populations and to measure efficacy of potential vaccines for further development. Limitations to the CHIVIM include lack of standardization, limited access to challenge viruses and assays, lack of consensus regarding role of the CHIVIM in vaccine development pathway, and concerns regarding risk to study participants and community. To address these issues, the panel of experts recommended that WHO and other key stakeholders provide guidance on standardization, challenge virus selection, and risk management. A common repository of well-characterized challenge viruses, harmonized protocols, and standardized assays should be made available to researchers. A network of research institutions performing CHIVIM trials should be created, and more study sites are needed to increase capacity. Experts agreed that a research network of institutions working with a standardized CHIVIM could contribute important data to support more rapid development and licensure of novel vaccines capable of providing long-lasting protection against seasonal and pandemic influenza strains.
Copyright ? 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Human challenge trial; Influenza; Influenza vaccine; Universal vaccine; Vaccine development

PMID: 31362819 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.080
 
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 14;37(35):4830-4834. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.053.
[h=1]Convening on the influenza human viral challenge model for universal influenza vaccines, Part 2: Methodologic considerations.[/h] Innis BL[SUP]1[/SUP], Scorza FB[SUP]2[/SUP], Blum JS[SUP]3[/SUP], Jain VK[SUP]4[/SUP], Aguilar AO[SUP]5[/SUP], Post DJ[SUP]6[/SUP], Roberts PC[SUP]7[/SUP], Wairagkar N[SUP]4[/SUP], White J[SUP]8[/SUP], Bresee J[SUP]9[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] In response to global interest in the development of a universal influenza vaccine, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, and the Global Funders Consortium for Universal Influenza Vaccine Development convened a meeting of experts (London, UK, May 2018) to assess the role of a standardized controlled human influenza virus infection model (CHIVIM) towards the development of novel influenza vaccine candidates. This report (in two parts) summarizes those discussions and offers consensus recommendations. Part 1 covers challenge virus selection, regulatory and ethical considerations, and issues concerning standardization, access, and capacity. This article (Part 2) summarizes the discussion and recommendations concerning CHIVIM methods. The panelists identified an overall need for increased standardization of CHIVIM trials, in order to produce comparable results that can support universal vaccine licensure. Areas of discussion included study participant selection and screening, route of exposure and dose, devices for administering challenge, rescue therapy, protection of participants and institutions, clinical outcome measures, and other considerations. The panelists agreed upon specific recommendations to improve the standardization and usefulness of the model for vaccine development. Experts agreed that a research network of institutions working with a standardized CHIVIM could contribute important data to support more rapid development and licensure of novel vaccines capable of providing long-lasting protection against seasonal and pandemic influenza strains.
Copyright ? 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Human challenge trial; Influenza; Influenza vaccine; Research methods; Universal vaccine

PMID: 31362820 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.053
 
Back
Top Bottom