• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

medRxiv [Preprint]. Dairy Environments with Milk Exposure are Most Likely to Have Detection of Influenza A Virus

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
medRxiv


[Preprint]. 2025 Sep 7:2025.09.03.25335023.
doi: 10.1101/2025.09.03.25335023.
Dairy Environments with Milk Exposure are Most Likely to Have Detection of Influenza A Virus

C Stenkamp-Strahm, B McCluskey, B Melody, B Christensen, N Urie, N Amey, R Lomkin, A J Campbell, S S Lakdawala, J Lombard
Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus of the H5N1 subtype has been infecting U.S dairy cattle and spreading among dairy farms since March 2024. H5N1 surveillance systems for dairy farms are needed, but information on whether environmental sampling can inform these systems is lacking. To guide a surveillance framework, we determined the environmental locations on H5N1-affected dairies (n = 25) in four states (California, Colorado, Michigan, and Ohio) that harbored influenza A virus (IAV), and explored sample characteristics that may influence viral detection. A total of 623 samples from environments and sale barns were characterized for IAV and classified into six categories based on location. A total of 94 samples (15.1%) had IAV detected, the majority in the following categories: milking equipment/personal protective equipment, parlor surfaces, and wastewater/lagoons/manure. These results suggest that dairy environments most likely to harbor IAV are those with exposure to milk, although the viral load in environmental samples was typically lower than that of bulk tank milk tested on a subset of farms. Mixed effect modeling was used to explore the relationship between IAV detection, Ct value, and days into an outbreak that samples were collected or the category where samples were collected. Days into an outbreak that samples were collected was associated with IAV detection while category of collection was associated with the measured Ct value. These results may guide H5N1 surveillance efforts on dairies, and can be strengthened by studies that collect samples from farm environmental locations prior to, during, and after H5N1 outbreak periods.


 
Back
Top Bottom