• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Medicine (Baltimore) . Successful treatment of a critically ill patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome from COVID-19 using mechanical ven

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Medicine (Baltimore)


. 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23160.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023160.
Successful treatment of a critically ill patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome from COVID-19 using mechanical ventilation strategy with low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure: A CARE-compliant case report


Wei-Guang Guo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bin Fang, Yan-Shan Xian, Zhi-Hui Yu, Li-Xin Zhou



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19 is different from the ARDS caused by other infections. Conventional mechanical ventilation strategies using high levels of PEEP may not be beneficial and can even be harmful to patient with ARDS from COVID-19. So the ventilation strategies should be adjusted in order to improve the pulmonary ventilation function and oxygenation status, and outcomes of the patient.
Patient concerns: Herein, we present a 76-year-old male patient with ARDS secondary to COVID-19. We describe our experience with mechanical ventilation strategy and the changes in respiratory mechanics in the patient during treatment.
Diagnosis: The patient had tested positive for coronavirus (COVID-19) in nucleic acid test. Chest CT showed multiple ground glass shadows in both lungs.
Interventions: The patient received mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume and low PEEP.
Outcomes: After treatment, the patients condition, as well as oxygenation status was improved, and he tested negative for the coronavirus several times.
Conclusion: This case demonstrated that the low tidal volume with low levels of PEEP ventilation strategy may be more suitable for ARDS from COVID-19.
 
Back
Top Bottom