Medical Tyranny

[sharon sanders]

FDA Caught Creating and Using Unreliable and Inconsistent Data to Create An Illusion of COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy as They Attempt to Justify Approval for Use in Infants and Toddlers

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/fda-caught-creating-and-using-unreliable

Urgent Action Item Below.

As promised, the FDA has ginned up a report that ostensibly will be used to try to justify “approval” (whatever they mean by that now) of COVID-19 vaccines for infants and toddlers (children < 5 years old). Here’s the report for your reference.

This report comes after a torrent of massive reports from Moderna and Pfizer that claim to review studies of the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in children. It is not hard to see what shenanigans the FDA has been up to to try to bolster a vaccine that fewer and fewer adults want. It’s more of the same: exaggerate the apparent risk of the virus and minimizing the perception of risk. In other words, lies.

1. There is no evidence of clinical urgency. Infants and toddlers (and children in general) do not get COVID-19; they do not (yet) die from COVID-19. All that can change when antibody dependent enhancement kicks in for the vaccinated. FDA’s own reports cites 1,086 deaths “from COVID-19” and 10,700,000 “cases” of COVID-19 in children aged 0-17. There have been 832 days since April 1, 2020 when diagnoses started for COVID-19. For the entire population of children in the US (73,000,000), the risk of COVID-19 infection since the onset of COVID is 10,700,000/73,000,000 = 0.14657. The risk of a child dying if they have a diagnosis is 1,086/10,700,00 or 1086/10700000 = 0.00010149532. The risk of any child dying of COVID-19 over this time period is 1,086/73000000 = 0.00001487671. The per-day risk is on the order of 1.78806611e-8 (0.000000001788). There is no real unmet clinical need and the FDA needs to go back to college to understand how to use RT-PCR correctly. Children do not get COVID-19, and they do not die.
2. Inconsistent use of the idea “vaccinated”. This has been the pattern from the very first study. FDA, CDC, Moderna, Pfizer, and others pull out whatever definition of “vaccinated” they want. Examples: “Vaccinated” is defined in the original trials as people who received both doses and who did not develop COVID-19 before two weeks passed after the second exposure to the vaccine. In fact, that means that people who developed COVID-19 due to disease enhancement were dropped from the study calculations. First, this is the first time people were dropped from a vaccine trial for getting infected with the pathogen targeted by the vaccine up to 13 or 14 days after being vaccinated. Second, it’s actually five entire weeks - one month and one week - 44 days - after the first exposure. ALL of the vaccine efficacy being cited by FDA is suspect. Moderna’s and Pfizer’s vaccines never achieved >90% true vaccine efficacy; the best estimate is more like 75%.
3. Inconsistent use of the idea “vaccine efficacy”. Over the time period since the first COVID-19 vaccine trials, various definitions of “vaccine efficacy” have been used. Decreased transmission. Reduction in infection rates. Reduced hospitalization. Presence of neutralizing antibodies. Presence of antibodies. All are used and cited in FDA’s report whenever convenient, all in an ad-hocmanner. It’s more than irritating. It’s moving the goal post and represents reckless (and ineffective) attempts to manipulate public perception. This practice continues in the reports and studies that are cited by FDA. I do not trust the efficacy data FDA cites in their report (why would we given Point 1?).
   
   Further evidence of the futility of the evidence used to claim efficacy comes from Moderna’s Sponsor Briefing report to the FDA:

-more...

Please see comments in the post above.

-----------------------------------------------------------

To James Lyons-Weiler:

Children DO GET COVID-19. If you want people to fairly evaluate your points - do not present information, as fact, that defies common sense. It calls into question your entire argument.


From the UK government - (My bolding in red).

Most school pupils in England had COVID-19 antibodies by March 2022

27 June 2022


Almost all primary and secondary school pupils in England had detectable levels of coronavirus (COVID-19) SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in March 2022.

Adjusted antibody data from the Schools Infection Survey, for March to April 2022, showed that more than 99% of secondary school pupils had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, comprised of 64.9% who were vaccinated and 34.4% who were unvaccinated.

For primary school pupils, 82.0% had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, based on adjusted figures. This is comprised of 0.4% who were vaccinated and 81.6% who were unvaccinated. (This means they had antibodies due to natural infection. s.s.)


High levels of antibody positivity among secondary school children were driven by both vaccination and natural infection


more...

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...cles/coronaviruscovid19/latestinsights#pupils

 

[Emily]

I believe children can be infected, but not all positive antibody tests are proof of infection, rather than passive antibody transfer. See: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf

I bet a lot of those asymptomatic animal studies using PCR and antibody tests were misleading, too.

 

[Emily]

https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/0...-paper-supporting-vaccine-pressure-campaigns/

U.S. Bioethics Chief, Who Happens to be Fauci’s Wife, Published a New Paper Telling Corporates They Can Ethically ‘Pressure Employees’ And ‘Embarrass Vaccine Resistors.’

The paper comes hot on the heels of a number of White House losses regarding federal worker vaccination and mask mandates.
Anthony Fauci’s wife – who is also head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center – authored a paper defending the ethics of corporations “pressuring employees to get vaccinated” and “embarrass[ing] vaccine resistors.”

The study – “The Ethics of Encouraging Employees to Get the COVID‑19 Vaccination” – was funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center and the National Human Genome Research Institute and counted Christine Grady, Fauci’s wife, amongst its authors.

Published in March 2022, the paper followed attempts by the White House as well as Democratic Party politicians across America to mandate COVID-19 vaccination for federal and state workers.

Grady’s paper focuses on the “ethics of encouragement strategies aimed at overcoming vaccine reluctance (which can be due to resistance, hesitance, misinformation, or inertia) to facilitate voluntary employee vaccination.”
...

While discussing vaccine mandates, the paper posits they can “be ethically appropriate” if there is “clear articulation about the consequences of not complying with the policy.”

“In that circumstance, employees have a choice between getting vaccinated or accepting the consequences of a choice to remain unvaccinated,” it explains.

Grady outlines other tactics employers could use to boost COVID-19 vaccination rates within their company, such as sharing “targeted statistics (such as 75% of the company or unit have been vaccinated) to spur competition or even implicitly embarrass vaccine resistors.”

“There can be social consequences associated with peer communication about vaccination, such as stigma and ostracization of those not vaccinated,” the paper asserts...

Bullying is bad advice, and it is never ethical, even if Covid vaccines significantly prevented disease transmission, which they don't. Hopefully we taxpayers can't be sued because we pay government employees to give advice that could result in personal harm or business financial losses.

https://lawkm.com/workplace-bullying/

Bullying In The Workplace: Examples And What You Can Do

Unfortunately, bullying doesn’t stay in middle school, and bullying in the workplace has become a hurtful trend. The trouble with bullying is that it’s often indistinct or quietly manipulative. Even though we’re no longer in middle school, we still have to deal with bullies. They can be in your workplace, a boss or a coworker, and their bullying techniques have sometimes become subtler but maybe just as, or more, damaging.

Workplace bullying may not be as obviously illegal as any other type of workplace assault; however, the effects of workplace bullying can be detrimental to the work environment and the victim’s health. Workplace bullying kills productivity. Beyond that, these interactions decrease company morale and increase employee turnover. These employee actions can cost many company dollars in work completed and training new workers.

On the individual employee level, bullying negatively impacts the victim’s job, health, and overall career. Since bullying can be sly, it’s often hard to recognize. Companies have been known to sugar coat the situations of workplace bullying in fancy or weak terminology to belittle the problem...

 

[GardenSpider]

Wuhan Laboratory Found to Have Conducted Novel Monkeypox Research One Year Before Global Outbreak

https://beckernews.com/new-covid-19...an-lab-one-year-before-global-outbreak-45076/

In a scientific article in Virologica Sinica, the official journal of the Chinese Society of Microbiology, the authors explained the process for artificially engineering a monkeypox virus. The journal article was submitted by researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, the State Key Laboratory of Virology and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It was published by Editor-in-Chief Professor Zheng-Li Shi, who is the Director for the Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Zheng-Li Shi, also known as the “bat woman,” has been deeply implicated in the suspected lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that may be traced to the ongoing worldwide Covid-19 outbreak. The New York Times, in a 2021 article, profiled Dr. Shi and highlighted doubt that the Wuhan Institute of Virology is blameless for the origination of the novel coronavirus pandemic. Years later, those doubts still linger about the Wuhan lab, fueled in part by the Biden administration‘s inability to issue a definitive statement on the matter.

In the journal article, the authors discuss the Transformation-associated recombination (TAR) process for assembling large DNA constructs, such as monkeypox viruses. The authors highlight the dual-selection system of synthesizing DNA sequences, which “has proven beneficial for TAR cloning” but “has never been applied to TAR assembly.”

“In this study, we added the PADH1-URA3 cassette to pGF as a negative selection marker and explored whether the dual-selection system could be applied in TAR assembly,” the authors state while using technical language.

“Monkey poxviruses (MPXVs) are large DNA viruses… As a member of the Orthopoxvirus genus in the family Poxviridae, MPXV is subdivided into the West African and Congo Basin clades,” the authors then state. “The latter is more pathogenic and has been reported to infect humans in various parts of the world,” the article adds.

“For MPXV [monkeypox] detection, Li et al. reported that the C3L (complement-binding protein) gene could be used as the qPCR target for the MPXV Congo Basin strain,” the authors add. “Since MPXV infection has never been associated with an outbreak in China, the viral genomic material required for qPCR detection is unavailable.”

-more...

 

[sharon sanders]

bump this

 

[GardenSpider]

Dr Deepak Kaushal's Falsification of Data Raises Serious Questions About His Involvement With Pfizer's C19 Vax Efficacy Claims

https://timtruth.substack.com/p/a-top-vax-scientists-research-misconduct

Gates Funded Dr Deepak Kaushal Settles With HHS’s Office Of Research Integrity Over Falsifying Research Data

A rather remarkable story broke this week. Dr Deepak Kaushal, who oversees the Texas Biomedical Research Institute’s $40+ million Southwest Primate Research Center which according to Science “receives about $10 million in federal funding per year and houses about 2500 marmosets, baboons, and macaques,” was credibly accused of research misconduct by the US Office of Research Integrity. He settled.

-snip-

The HHS’s Office of Research Integrity (ORI) put out a press release on August 8, 2022 that their investigation into Deepak Kaushal, Ph.D. of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute indicated that he had committed research misconduct, over and over again:

“ORI found that Respondent engaged in research misconduct by intentionally, knowingly, and/or recklessly falsifying and fabricating the experimental methodology to demonstrate results obtained under different experimental conditions that were included in the following one (1) published paper and two (2) grant applications submitted for PHS funds” (src)​

-more...

 

[Emily]

To be clear this is not Kaushal's Covid research, but the behavior is egregious. When a police officer breaches professional ethics in evidence collection or court testimony in just one case, the validity of every trial he/she ever testified in is in so much doubt that years of convictions can be overturned. It is a get out of jail free card. If any mandates or recommendations were influenced by Kaushal's Covid research - they should be reversed, too, and reparations paid to those who suffered due to them.
And he shouldn't be experimenting on any animals in the future.

https://ori.hhs.gov/content/case-summary-kaushal-deepak
Case Summary: Kaushal, Deepak


Deepak Kaushal, Ph.D., Texas Biomedical Research Institute: Based on the report of an inquiry conducted by the Texas Biomedical Research Institute (TBRI), Respondent’s admission, and additional analysis conducted by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) in its oversight review, ORI found that Deepak Kaushal, Ph.D. (Respondent), Professor and Director, Southwest National Primate Research Center, Host Pathogen Interactions Program, TBRI, engaged in research misconduct in research supported by U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) funds, specifically National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants U19 AI111211, R01 AI111943, R01 AI123047, R01 AI134240, K24 AI058609, and K24 AI114444, and Office of the Director, NIH, grants P51 OD011104 and P51 OD011133.
ORI found that Respondent engaged in research misconduct by intentionally, knowingly, and/or recklessly falsifying and fabricating the experimental methodology to demonstrate results obtained under different experimental conditions that were included in the following one (1) published paper and two (2) grant applications submitted for PHS funds:

• Isoniazid and Rifapentine Treatment Eradicates Persistent Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Macaques. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb 15;201(4):469-77; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0646OC (hereafter referred to as “Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020”). Retraction in: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr 15;203(8):1045; doi: 10.1164/rccm.v203retraction1.

• R01 AI159898-01, “Effect of latent TB infection on immunity to M. tuberculosis reinfection,” submitted to NIAID, NIH, on June 25, 2020.

• R01 AI147947-01A1, “Effect of prior latent TB infection on immune responses to M. tuberculosis,” submitted to NIAID, NIH, on July 18, 2019.

Specifically, ORI found that Respondent knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly:

• falsified and fabricated the numbers for treated and untreated non-human primates (NHP) used in the study. The experimental design in Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 falsely stated that seven NHPs were treated with 3HP (i.e., a treatment regimen constituting of twelve once-weekly doses of 15 mg/kg isoniazid [INH] and 15 mg/kg rifapentine [RPT]) and another seven NHPs were untreated controls, when instead a total of eight NHPs were treated with INH and RPT and six NHPs were untreated controls.

• falsified and fabricated the number of weekly doses of INH and RPT treatment administered to NHPs in the study. The experimental design in Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 falsely stated that seven NHPs were treated with 3HP, when instead the NHPs were treated with a variable number of INH and RPT doses that do not conform to the 3HP regimen.

• falsified and fabricated the time interval between mycobacterium (Mtb) exposure and the first dose of INH and RPT treatments that were administered to NHPs in the study. The experimental design in Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 falsely stated that seven NHPs were treated with 3HP beginning in Week 16-18 after Mtb infection, when instead the treated NHPs received the first dose of INH and RPT treatment at different time points.

• falsified and fabricated the time interval between the last weekly doses of INH and IPT treatment and infection with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). The experimental design in Figure 3A of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 falsely stated that after treatment with weekly INH and RPT for three months, NHPs were rested for one month before coinfection with SIV, when instead the treated NHPs were infected with SIV either on the same day as the last dose of INH and RPT treatment or at a different time point.

• included survival kinetics data from the falsified 3HP treatment in Figure 1G of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 as Figure 5 of R01 AI159898-01 to demonstrate the efficacy of 3HP treatment against reactivation of latent Mtb infection in NHPs post SIV infection.

• included bacterial persistence and burden data from the falsified 3HP treatment in Figures 2A, 2B, and 2C of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 as Figure 6C of R01 AI159898-01 and Figure 2 of R01 AI147947-01A1 to represent the efficacy of 3HP treatment in reducing Mtb burden in NHPs post SIV infection.

• included pulmonary pathology data from the falsified 3HP treatment in Figures 3A and 3B of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 as Figures 6A and 6B, respectively, of R01 AI159898-01 to represent the efficacy of 3HP treatment against reactivation of latent Mtb infected NHPs post SIV infection.

• included clinical parameters from the falsified 3HP treatment in Figure 1 of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 as Figure 1 of R01 AI147947-01A1 to present clinical correlates of latent Mtb infection and SIV induced reactivation under 3HP treatment.

• included pulmonary pathology data from the falsified 3HP treatment in Figure 3 of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 as Figure 3 of R01 AI147947-01A1 to represent efficacy of 3HP treatment in reducing lung pathology due to reactivation of latent Mtb infection in NHPs post SIV infection.

• included untreated NHP’s lung tissue immunohistochemistry image representing CD3-positive T-cell staining from Figure 4B of Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 as Figure 6A of R01 AI147947-01A1 to represent CD3-positive T-cell staining in lung tissue of 3HP treated NHPs.

Dr. Kaushal entered into a Voluntary Settlement Agreement (Agreement) and voluntarily agreed to the following:

1. Respondent will have his research supervised for a period of one (1) year beginning on July 22, 2022 (the “Supervision Period”). Prior to the submission of an application for PHS support for a research project on which Respondent’s participation is proposed and prior to Respondent’s participation in any capacity in PHS-supported research, Respondent will submit a plan for supervision of Respondent’s duties to ORI for approval. The supervision plan must be designed to ensure the integrity of Respondent’s research. Respondent will not participate in any PHS-supported research until such a supervision plan is approved by ORI. Respondent will comply with the agreed-upon supervision plan.

1. The requirements for Respondent’s supervision plan are as follows:

1. A committee of 2-3 senior faculty members at the institution who are familiar with Respondent’s field of research, but not including Respondent’s supervisor or collaborators, will provide oversight and guidance for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of this Agreement. The committee will review primary data from Respondent’s laboratory on a quarterly basis and submit a report to ORI at six (6) month intervals setting forth the committee meeting dates and Respondent’s compliance with appropriate research standards and confirming the integrity of Respondent’s research.
2. The committee will conduct an advance review of each application for PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or abstract involving PHS-supported research in which Respondent is involved. The review will include a discussion with Respondent of the primary data represented in those documents and will include a certification to ORI that the data presented in the proposed application, report, manuscript, or abstract are supported by the research record.

1. During the Supervision Period, Respondent will ensure that any institution employing him submits, in conjunction with each application for PHS funds, or report, manuscript, or abstract involving PHS-supported research in which Respondent is involved, a certification to ORI that the data provided by Respondent are based on actual experiments or are otherwise legitimately derived and that the data, procedures, and methodology are accurately reported and not plagiarized in the application, report, manuscript, or abstract.

1. If no supervision plan is provided to ORI, Respondent will provide certification to ORI at the conclusion of the Supervision Period that his participation was not proposed on a research project for which an application for PHS support was submitted and that he has not participated in any capacity in PHS-supported research.

1. During the Supervision Period, Respondent will exclude himself voluntarily from serving in any advisory or consultant capacity to PHS including, but not limited to, service on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer review committee.

---

Related Content

• Federal Register Notice: Volume 87, Number 151(Monday, August 8, 2022). (.pdf)

---

Source URL: https://ori.hhs.gov/content/case-summary-kaushal-deepak

 

[GardenSpider]

'They Cooked the Books': Hyperinflated Death Counts and Foul Play With Death Certificates

"People who died from the shot are being counted as COVID deaths.”

https://thevigilantfox.substack.com/p/they-cooked-the-books-hyperinflated

It’s our time to bat. The chance to convene a Grand Jury investigation against the CDC is finally here as Dr. Henry Ealy, and the team behind beyondthecon.com finally received a late response from the defendants on August 27.

We “now have only until September 12 to respond and urge the court, on behalf of freedom-loving Americans, to rule in our favor and get our petition before a Grand Jury to investigate our allegations against the defendants.”

--more..

 

[GardenSpider]

'That's Beyond Fraud': How FEMA Tried to Bribe Ernest Ramirez to Change His Son's Death Certificate to COVID

"I told them I would never do that. I would definitely never disrespect my son in that way."

https://thevigilantfox.substack.com/p/thats-beyond-fraud-how-fema-bribed

Perhaps one of the most heartbreaking and tragic tales of the past two and a half years is the story of Ernest Ramirez Jr. (right). He was a 16-year-old boy, son of Ernest Ramirez Sr. (left), and “the best son a father could ask for.” But unfortunately, he died of heart complications five days after his first Pfizer shot in April 2021.

“The autopsy came back with heart enlargement. The teenager’s heart was twice the size expected for his age. He died within five days of the shot, which is when many cases of myocarditis and pericarditis are showing up post-vaccination in teens, especially boys.” — Circleofmamas.com

More...

 

[GardenSpider]

This is a riveting read. Especially for anyone who has been following this story from the beginning.

Investigation: In 2018, the US Deep State funded Daszak to create Covid-19 for Moderna’s Vaccine Platform

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON OCTOBER 9, 2022 • ( 30 COMMENTS )

https://expose-news.com/2022/10/09/us-funded-daszak-create-covid-in-2018-for-moderna/

Once one understands that the entire pandemic and vaccination response was a US deep state (intelligence) operation, then everything makes sense.

Moderna, the NIH, the NIAID, are all playing their role in a scheme designed to do to your genetics what Google has already done to your search results and what Microsoft and Apple have done to your computers and mobile phones, and what Facebook, Twitter and Instagram have done to your social life.

By a concerned reader

We know this to be true because in late 2019 SARS- CoV-2 and Covid19 appeared with a humanized furin cleavage site in precisely the position that Daszak had proposed and furthermore it took the humanized codon form of CCT CGG CGG GCA CGT coding for the 5 amino acids PRRAR, in a humanised furin cleavage site. Which form is unknown in any virus at all. But it is known in cows and humans and many bacteria. Since cows, bacteria and humans cannot infect viruses, nature cannot have put it there. The only way for that coding to get into a virus is by a human being gene splicing it into the viral genome.

So we know that a human called Peter Daszak proposed the insertion in early 2018. We know that only a human could have achieved it. And we know that said insertion was achieved in late 2019. And we know that said insertion was the only difference between SARS-CoV-2 (causing Covid-19) and the bat coronavirus RaTG13, longer than one Codon (3 bases). And we know that the insertion occurred at the place where Daszak had proposed to insert it. And we know that the insertion was a humanised furin cleavage site as Daszak had proposed. In other words, SARS-CoV-2 was the fulfilment of the 75-page project DEFUSE proposal.

If DARPA had accepted the proposal, we would all know that Peter Daszak made Covid-19 (using the term metonymically to stand for the virus that causes the disease).

So the question now becomes. Would DARPA, whose job it is to fund Advanced Research Projects in order to give the US a strategic advantage over its competitors in all areas of human conflict, have said to Peter Daszak: Sorry old chap. We are not interested in your bioweapon because it is just too dangerous for us! But we do know you have a lot of dealings with Wuhan. So why not try the Chinese with this really dangerous bioweapon you are proposing to make? Maybe you will have better luck with them? I cannot imagine anything more implausible.

Their reasons for rejection were essentially…

• Gain of Function concern
• Dual Use Research of Concern
• Vaccine epitope coverage (immunity would be too narrow being restricted only to the spike protein – yes indeed! – they were worried that the vaccines would not work since their immunity would be too specific!)
• Regulatory requirements
• ELSI (ethical, legal, and social issues)
• Data Usage

In other words: They rejected his application because he presented it in the wrong typeface (in biological terms).

It is clear from the events immediately following the official rejection that the project was funded extremely quickly in a clandestine way. Because for an unfunded project it was singularly successful, in a very short period of time!

So it was classified. That is why DARPA outwardly rejected it. So the US deep state essentially employed Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance to make Covid-19 for US covert operations.

It is also apparent that it was funded AND produced in a clandestine way because Peter Daszak arranged for a letter to be written to the Lancet by 27 academics on 2020February19 calling all scientists who rejected a natural origin for Covid-19 conspiracy theorists. Whereas the true conspiracy theory was that there was any way it could have come from nature…

“The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumours and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin. Scientists from multiple countries have published and analysed genomes of the causative agent, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and they overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife, as have so many other emerging pathogens.

This is further supported by a letter from the presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine and by the scientific communities they represent. Conspiracy theories do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice that jeopardise our global collaboration in the fight against this virus. We support the call from the Director-General of WHO to promote scientific evidence and unity over misinformation and conjecture. We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus. We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the frontline!
We speak in one voice. To add your support for this statement, sign our letter online. LM is editor of ProMED-mail. We declare no competing interests.” – https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...418-9/fulltext​

That letter is not the wording of a scientist. It is the wording of an intelligence operative, a lying manipulator, a deceiver, a slanderer.

Read more....

 

[GardenSpider]

California’s Misinformation Epidemic Pt. 1

I recently had the pleasure of getting to know one of my favorite pseudonymous writers on Substack who goes by "A Midwestern Doctor." This powerful essay needs as wide exposure as possible.

https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/ca...ation-epidemic

California’s Misinformation Epidemic Pt. 2


A Midwestern Doctor

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.c...ation-epidemic

In the first half of this series (which must be read to fully understand this second half) I reviewed how those in power always seek to censor information for their own benefit, and how big business will always seek to take every step necessary to monopolize their markets. Much of the COVID-19 disaster is a direct result of those parties (some of whom had previously been criminally charged for antitrust violations) working diligently to monopolize the truth in the years leading up to COVID-19 and their actions have left us in a dramatically different information landscape than what we had just a few years ago.

 

[GardenSpider]

What this means: In the state of California, doctors are not allowed to give their patients informed consent. If they stray from the government and Big Pharma narrative (now proven false), they risk loosing their medical license.

Bill Title: Physicians and surgeons: unprofessional conduct.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 6-0)

Status: (Passed) 2022-09-30 - Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 938, Statutes of 2022. [AB2098 Detail]

https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB2098/2021


Assembly Bill No. 2098
CHAPTER 938
An act to add Section 2270 to the Business and Professions Code, relating to healing arts.
[ Approved by Governor September 30, 2022. Filed with Secretary of State September 30, 2022. ]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

AB 2098, Low. Physicians and surgeons: unprofessional conduct.
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California. Existing law requires the applicable board to take action against any licensed physician and surgeon who is charged with unprofessional conduct, as provided.

This bill would designate the dissemination of misinformation or disinformation related to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, or “COVID-19,” as unprofessional conduct. The bill would also make findings and declarations in this regard.

SECTION 1.

The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a) The global spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, or COVID-19, has claimed the lives of over 6,000,000 people worldwide, including nearly 90,000 Californians.
(b) Data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that unvaccinated individuals are at a risk of dying from COVID-19 that is 11 times greater than those who are fully vaccinated.
(c) The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines have been confirmed through evaluation by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the vaccines continue to undergo intensive safety monitoring by the CDC.
(d) The spread of misinformation and disinformation about COVID-19 vaccines has weakened public confidence and placed lives at serious risk.
(e) Major news outlets have reported that some of the most dangerous propagators of inaccurate information regarding the COVID-19 vaccines are licensed health care professionals.
(f) The Federation of State Medical Boards has released a statement warning that physicians who engage in the dissemination of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation risk losing their medical license, and that physicians have a duty to provide their patients with accurate, science-based information.
(g) In House Resolution No. 74 of the 2021–22 Regular Session, the California State Assembly declared health misinformation to be a public health crisis, and urged the State of California to commit to appropriately combating health misinformation and curbing the spread of falsehoods that threaten the health and safety of Californians.SEC. 2.

Section 2270 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:

2270.

(a) It shall constitute unprofessional conduct for a physician and surgeon to disseminate misinformation or disinformation related to COVID-19, including false or misleading information regarding the nature and risks of the virus, its prevention and treatment; and the development, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.
(b) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) “Board” means the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, as applicable.
(2) “Disinformation” means misinformation that the licensee deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead.
(3) “Disseminate” means the conveyance of information from the licensee to a patient under the licensee’s care in the form of treatment or advice.
(4) “Misinformation” means false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.
(5) “Physician and surgeon” means a person licensed by the Medical Board of California or the Osteopathic Medical Board of California under Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 2000).
(c) Section 2314 shall not apply to this section.

SEC. 3.

The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

 

[GardenSpider]

SHIFTING NARRATIVES
Dr. Naomi Wolf wins to discuss the changes in covid policy

Mark Steyn of GB News interviews various guests to discuss COVID vaccines, adverse events and sudden adult death syndrome.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/OIpDJYI361Tk/

 

[GardenSpider]

Here is a video titled, "Bending the Truth: Misinformation and Disinformation"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1QXo6Jl5gQ

It shows the stance of this organization on COVID and what they consider to be medical ‘misinformation'. The lawyer in this video, Saywer, has and still does work for the WHO. He speaks about his confidence that the first amendment does not apply to the doctor/patient relationship, and that there are ‘bad' scientific Journals publishing articles with misinformation.

What I find astonishing is instead of reviewing the data on vaccine induced injury and death (of which there is a great deal), they simply brush it off (and dismiss all those doctors and even the journals, sounding the alarm that there is a dangerous safety signal), as misinformation. In the face of great bodily harm being done by the CoVid shot, such a greater level of denial by the medical boards we have never observed. What will it take for them to finally admit the so-called vaccines, have not only failed, but have injured and killed people. For which they are all complicit.

Federation of State Medical Boards

Health-related disinformation and misinformation has been a threat to patient safety for centuries, but in today’s hyper accelerated media environment – and in the midst of a global pandemic -- it has taken on a new significance. When disinformation or misinformation comes from licensed physicians, it raises significant challenges for state medical boards as they carry out their mission of public protection. During this session, panelists will discuss the issue from a variety of perspectives, including potential strategies for the medical regulatory community in response.

 

[Emily]

We watched the first half last night and plan to watch the rest.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...the-premiere-of-the-real-anthony-fauci-movie/

https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com/trailer/?sub4=14d6333ffe344580922fc05d5aabcdee&afid=362

 

[GardenSpider]

I hope people take a deep breath and realize we've all been lied to. The premise for the mandates and thus the lockdowns and social distancing etc... were ALL based on false information propagated by Big Pharma.

Here is a recent post by Dr. Mike Yeadon on Telegram.

"I’m getting jaded in that, reading that CDC pressured FDA to authorize c19 “booster shots” without any clinical data no longer surprises me.

The entire medical system has failed completely. No assumption about rigour & caring about your safety can be made any more. The consequences are dreadful. You cannot trust anything you’re told about health by any component of the healthcare industry. I know I don’t. It’s been a shocking transition for me but I doubt confidence will ever return. It certainly won’t for me.

What did surprise me was this piece of history. I heard Bobby Kennedy say it on one of The Real Anthony Fauci films.

Best wishes

Mike

"In January 2017, Kennedy was asked by then-president Trump to run a vaccine safety commission, he said.
Kennedy agreed to head the commission to “make sure the right studies were being done to make sure that each vaccine was actually working” by conducting control studies — “the same studies that are required for every other medication.”

But when it was announced that Kennedy would lead the vaccine safety commission, “there was panic throughout the industry and the public health regulatory agencies,” he said.

Next, came a financial power play.

Pfizer made a $1 million contribution to Trump, Kennedy told Kelly, after which Trump appointed two people “hand-picked by Pfizer” as top officials for the government’s health regulatory agencies.

Those two people were Alex Azar, to run the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Gottlieb to run the FDA.
Both Azar and Gottlieb had executive ties to Big Pharma.

That signaled the premature death of the control studies on vaccines.

“They killed the vaccine safety commission,” Kennedy said. “I don’t know exactly how it happened, but as soon as those guys got in there they stopped answering our calls or communicating with us.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...e-boosters-et/

 

[sharon sanders]

I agree that no one can really be trusted. Most are motivated solely by money. I want to point out that I don't believe anything from Children's Health Defense fund either. There are donate buttons and solitications on the site and it appears to be big business with at least a dozen job openings. Right now there is a banner to raise 2 million dollars across the top of the entry page.

I think everyone should wake up that many, MANY entities try to make $$$ off disease tragedies.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...e-boosters-et/

 

[sharon sanders]

Always follow the money. With "big pharma" we know the motivation. It is clearly $$$. I do not believe anything from pharma unless I can see some real life results.

With these other groups, it is not alway very clear who is doing what.

 

[GardenSpider]

CHD is an amazing resource. And of course they need funds to operate as any news organization does. To dismiss them out of hand, the hard and careful work of their journalists reporting on news censored by mainstream media, is to do yourself a disservice.

The book and the movie, THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI, has over 2,000 citations, and is full of carefully documented facts so people can reliably trust what they learn.

And while there are many profiteers on this world-wide fraud and scandal, none are greater than Big Pharma, the so-called medical experts such as FAUCI and others receiving kick-backs, and the perpetrators of the fraud from the CDC to the FDA.

Read the book. Watch the film. Discover for yourself. And yes, do subscribe to the CHD. They tell the truth about what is really going on with this plandemic and cite important research to support their claims.

 

[GardenSpider]

The WHO is Trying to Implement a Global Surveillance Treaty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=knbI-Kw8Egw

James Roguski explains what the so-called pandemic treaty is all about. And he also addresses the digitial IDs which is a cornerstone of what the W.H.O. wants to do with their unlimited and unchecked power.