• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

Awesome thread, Sharpe. This kind of information feels so fresh, and is no less to be respected than the smug "modern" reports we see about the present threat (eg, that sulawesi cluster the media won't notice, the "solutions" to H5N1 that are announced every month). I'll be reading these all night.
Thank you,
DA
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

I'm wondering about the mortality in the 1830-3 (flu-)pandemic.
Osterholm wrote it were equally severe as 1918-20,
while Potter gives a graphic indicating there were only about 1 million deaths worldwide, high infection rate but small mortality.
Should you happen to find something about this,
I'd appreciate. (you needn't search too much, if it's difficult...)
 
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

gsgs said:
I'm wondering about the mortality in the 1830-3 (flu-)pandemic.
Osterholm wrote it were equally severe as 1918-20,
while Potter gives a graphic indicating there were only about 1 million deaths worldwide, high infection rate but small mortality.
Should you happen to find something about this,
I'd appreciate. (you needn't search too much, if it's difficult...)

Next time I look, I'll look that up. They don't talk about the pandemic in those older journals much, however. In 1832, they were far more interested in talking about how great ether is for surgery. :) But I didn't look at the 1831 one.
 
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

I invite all of you to read a book that Donaldson manage to have access to. Last time it was pull out of the public library it was over 40 yrs ago.

The Cholera Epidemic in Upper Canada 1832-1866

As we read this 60 pages book we see the social reaction. How the politics managed the situation and how individuals cope.
 
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

Medical News
March 28, 1891

New Orleans

The Charity Hospital Board of Administrators have presented their report to the State Legislature for the year 1890. The total number of patients treated was larger than it has ever been before. 6680 patients were admitted into the wards, 13,315 were treated in the outdoor consultation clinics, … There were 1023 deaths during the year. The mortality of the hospital patients was materially increased during the last three months of the year owing to the large number of cases of pneumonia which occurred during the epidemic of “la grippe” prevailing at that time. …



Interesting because I’ve seen other case reports of acute parotitis in 1918 Spanish Flu patients. Naturally they think it’s caused by bacteria. I just find it interesting because mumps is a related virus (parainfluenza). Perhaps it is caused by a bacteria, but it is interesting nevertheless.

Medical News
March 14, 1891

Parotitis due to Pneumococcus

Duplay, in La Semaine Medicale of January 14, 1891, reports an interesting case of parotitis following an attack of pneumonia in a man 47 years old. Succeeding all the symptoms of a well-developed pneumonia, there suddenly ensued an enormous swelling in the region of the left parotid gland, with an edema of the entire side of the face, and accompanied by a rise of temperature and symptoms of general depression. ….
 
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

This is yet another interesting article. They took samples from the livers of people in Egypt who had died rapidly from Spanish Flu and they injected them in rabbits, and then continued to transfer samples from one rabbit to another, resulting in faster and faster death. They thought it was pneumococcus they were dealing with, obviously, but we know what else was lurking in the broth.

Lancet
June 28, 1919

Pathogenic properties of the Diplococcus

?


? In view of the increased virulence of the disease in October, the experiments were repeated with rabbits. 0.5 cubic cm of nutrient broth culture were injected intraperitoneally, the diplococci having been isolated in pure culture from the liver of fatal cases. Some 12 to 14 hours after inoculation, the rabbit began to show signs of distress; the temperature gradually rose, it suffered from diarrhea, and gradually became more and more lethargic, finally dying in from 22-28 hours in a state of coma. ? In every case, the pleural cavities contained a hemorrhagic exudate? By passage through three or four rabbits the virulence of the organism can be still further increased and a fatal result obtained in from 15-20 hours.



Interesting?note the nephritis (kidney infection)

Lancet
March 15, 1919

The Influenza epidemic in British Guiana

The recent influenza pandemic appears first to have made itself manifest in Georgetown, the capital of the colony, in November 1918. Clinically the symptoms do not appear to differ from those characteristic of the disease in other centres which have suffered its ravages. The disease has taken a fearful toll, more particularly of the lower classes of the community, the poor East Indian and black, generally already debilitated by the ravages of chronic malaria or filarial infection. Death has been due, in the vast majority of cases, to a rapidly fatal broncho-pneumonia, and the purpose of this article is to give a short account of the pathology and bacteriology of the disease in this country.

Post-mortem findings are based on examinations carried out on 24 fatal cases of influenza at the height of the epidemic. Generally marked cyanosis was present externally. Internally the pathological changes appear to center in the respiratory tract; nasopharynx, pharynx, larynx, trachea, and bronchi show congestion of the mucous membrane with exudate varying to a certain extent in character, but generally tenacious and sometimes stained with blood. Pleurisy was rare, only being present in two cases and then of the acute fibrinous variety.

The heart and pericardium showed no particular change. The lungs showed generally a broncho-pneumonia of the diffuse variety. If only a portion of the lung were involved, it was invariably the base, and a constant feature was the intense congestion of the lungs; the broncho-pneumonic areas on section are hard and reddish-gray in color.

The brain was involved in only one case ? An acute parenchymatous nephritis was present in a few cases. The liver frequently showed some fatty change.



Jan 4th, 1919
Lancet

The Influenza Scourge

Commencing in late September, Canada has passed through a terrible epidemic of influenza. It is yet impossible to give any figures for the whole country, but the deaths in Toronto reached as high as 150 on one dya. In Canada the disease has not been made reportable or notifiable and no quarantine has been practiced, but isolation has been put into force to some extent by private practitioners and in hospitals. Toronto grappled with the epidemic by rapidly preparing two emergency hospitals, one of which has not been used. Toronto?s health officer claims that that city reached the crest of the epidemic much earlier than other Canadian and American cities (think Sars?). Some physicians used a prophylactic vaccine and speak well of it, and the Ontario Board of Health participated in the making of such vaccine. That board discussed reporting, isolation, and quarantine in regard to influenza before the epidemic invaded the province, but concluded that these measures were impracticable. There was much disruption of business and educational life, but speaking generally, each municipality was left to its own resources in fighting the disease. Evidence is strong that the mass of the people still cling to alcohol in the treatment of influenza. In Prince Edward Island, clergymen were empowered to write prescriptions for alcoholic liquors (funny stuff), and temperance laws were in general more plastic than at other times. In Toronto there are two licensed vendors of liquors under the Ontario Temperance Act and the long lines of waiting citizens testified to the number of prescriptions written by physicians. The Montreal Board of Health had prepared a circular advising the public to take to bed and send for the physician at the first sign of the disease. In regard to vaccines, the public was informed that the treatment was still in an experimental stage, and that no body of medical opinion was prepared to endorse their use as a prophylactic measure. The opinion has been widely expressed that the epidemic of influenza ?has taken a terrible fall out of? preventive medicine. It is scarcely understandable how medical officers simply waited for the inevitable. {WHO repeating history)


January 4th, 1919
Lancet

?The Symptoms?

The onset has generally been sudden and acute. There have, of course, been many quite mild cases, but again and again a perfectly healthy man may be taken ill in the street or on duty with a sense of general malaise; he feels chilly, suffers from aches in his back, limbs and head, and rapidly develops such a sense of prostration that wherever he is he has to lie down. He may rally sufficiently to be able to himself back to his quarters with some difficulty , or he may be so bad that he has to be carried.

He gets to bed and is only too glad to stay there. He is nauseated at the sight of food and ?feels rotten?. Though drowsy, often he cannot sleep. His temperature is raised, generally as high as 104 degrees, or more. The pulse is full and firm, its rate isas a rule not raised proportionately to his temperature, and his respiration rate is between 18 and 30. Many cases have red injected palate and anterior fauces and complain of severe throat, but many have no such complaint, and on examination of the chest, physical signs are absent. The tongue is almost invariably coated with a thick fur, superficially yellowish-brown at the back and on the dorsum, pale yellowish-white beneath the darker surface and often with no fur on the margins and tip.

Epistaxis, sometimes of almost alarming degree, has been an unusually common phenomenon in this epidemic, sometimes at the beginning, more often after the patient has already gone to bed, and in quite a number of cases, the hearing has become much impaired, a few cases having become temporarily stone deaf (this was noted in 1890 too). Quinine prophylaxis may be factor in this, but that there is middle-ear catarrh in at least some of the cases has been shown by subsequent ear discharge, and in one or two cases by considerable bleeding from each ear.

Vomiting has not been usual, but it has occurred often enough to attract attention. Diarrhea to the extent of six or seven loose motions on the first day or two has been rather less uncommon.

Abdominal pain has not been a pronounced feature although occasionally it has existed of sufficiently severe character to lead to a provisional diagnosis of appendicitis, and even to some solicitude as to differentiation from an acute abdominal condition urgently needing operation.

?(fascinating stuff on the severe symptoms?I will hopefully get a chance to type this up some time). On the ?smell? of influenza patients, hemorrhages, hematemis, hemoptysis, color of the patient, cough, parotitis, interesting rashes, and nephritis (actually I might copy a sentence from the nephritis paragraph in light of the kidney failure patients in India we are reading about this week.)

?.

Large, red blood-oozing kidneys of the type seen in acute scarlatinal uremia have been almost constant at the autopsies of the fatal cases, and the occurrence of this acute nephritis is further evidence of the infecting agent, or at any rate its toxins, being widespread throughout the body, the ?pneumonic? part of the disease being but a portion of the whole.

????
 
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

Fascinating - thanks Sharpe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

This is just fantastic information. So much to digest and consider. I am so grateful for all the effort and time that you put into this research.

In my initial reading I felt like I was in the science fiction movie of seeing history repeat itself.

I wonder if anyone was like the flutrackers. I realize that there was not the science and the communications like we benefit from but were there signs that naturalist or some other group noticed that gave indications. Don't know why I am asking this but something inside of me feels like there were persons who noticed trends ahead of time.

My grandmother use to day "what goes around comes around" and she was a wise woman!
TM
 
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

Sharpe- question- the "super renals" mentioned in the first article- are they talking about adrenals?

The mention of malodorous breath- certainly may be from blood breakdown- but I learned first hand that leukopenia may result in candida overgrowth, which can cause a dark furry tongue as well as white-and lousy breath. Makes everything taste really bad, too. I wonder if thats related?

The other thing that comes to mind- when the immune system is subverted to attack the viral infected tissues, it stops or dramatically reduces surveillance and control of other subacute or colonized microbes. Could the high incidence of strep found in the young military recruits in 1918 be due to subclinical infection?

These were pre-antibiotic times, and scarlet fever and step tonsillitis were common. Even if not recently ill with strep themselves, many may have been carriers or in recent contact with sibs with recent illness. Immune dysfunction may have led to sudden reemergence of the infection.

Just a few thoughts, FWIW!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

LMonty said:
Sharpe- question- the "super renals" mentioned in the first article- are they talking about adrenals?

Dear LMonty, yes, the suprarenals refer to the adrenals.

The mention of malodorous breath- certainly may be from blood breakdown- but I learned first hand that leukopenia may result in candida overgrowth, which can cause a dark furry tongue as well as white-and lousy breath. Makes everything taste really bad, too. I wonder if thats related?

Interesting thought. Candida however grows very slowly--over weeks, and these cases are occurring within hours, so I don't think it's a result of candida. It is possible that it's a bacterial overgrowth effect, but that's kind of hard to know. Most likely the explanation of blood breakdown is most accurate, but again, without more information, it's hard to know.

The other thing that comes to mind- when the immune system is subverted to attack the viral infected tissues, it stops or dramatically reduces surveillance and control of other subacute or colonized microbes. Could the high incidence of strep found in the young military recruits in 1918 be due to subclinical infection?

Very good point. The immune system would indeed have trouble dealing with bacterial invaders. That is partly why bacterial pneumonia is such a common after-effect of influenza infection--the immune response and the virus have damaged the lining of the respiratory tract and it's inherent ability to remove bacteria via ciliated cells into the lymph nodes etc. is disabled, bacteria enter the lungs, are not removed, and start to divide resulting in bacterial pneumonia. The doctors and scientists of 1918, however thought that the bacteria, such as streptococcus pneumoniae was responsible for the Spanish Flu. Therefore they looked in every patient and in some of them they found it. Why is it a misunderstanding? Because it naturally colonizes most of us anyway, without causing any harm. Only someone made very vulnerable by a viral infection or other sickness is attacked by the bacteria. Just look at this study of healthy Dutch children published this year. 19% of them had it in their throats, and at the age of 2, more than half did. It's VERY common. You find what you're looking for, and they found it in droves, but because they didn't find it all the time, they became suspicious that it was the 'cause' of Spanish Flu, rightly so, kept investigating, until eventually they discovered the virus.

http://mic.sgmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/152/2/377

These were pre-antibiotic times, and scarlet fever and step tonsillitis were common. Even if not recently ill with strep themselves, many may have been carriers or in recent contact with sibs with recent illness. Immune dysfunction may have led to sudden reemergence of the infection.

Just a few thoughts, FWIW!

You're absolutely right. Great comments.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Medical articles from 1832, 1889 and 1918

T. Modesto said:
This is just fantastic information. So much to digest and consider. I am so grateful for all the effort and time that you put into this research.

In my initial reading I felt like I was in the science fiction movie of seeing history repeat itself.

I wonder if anyone was like the flutrackers. I realize that there was not the science and the communications like we benefit from but were there signs that naturalist or some other group noticed that gave indications. Don't know why I am asking this but something inside of me feels like there were persons who noticed trends ahead of time.

My grandmother use to day "what goes around comes around" and she was a wise woman!
TM


Very interesting points, Dr. Modesto. I wonder too if anyone was like FT. I think it is very likely. Letters to the editor like #19 clearly indicate that there were people thinking about it. I did see a very interesting article today that I didn't post, but thought I'd mention it briefly now. It was a short summary of animal diseases in Great Britain. It said that it was well known that the number of all domestic animals in the UK had dropped substantially over the previous three-four years. It then went on to say that this was most likely due to parasites and soldiers being in foreign countries and thus not looking after the animals properly. It is very curious, I must say.
 
Back
Top