• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Med (N Y) . ù Differential immunogenicity of homologous versus heterologous boost in Ad26.COV2.S vaccine recipients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Med (N Y)


. 2022 Jan 19.
doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.12.004. Online ahead of print.
Differential immunogenicity of homologous versus heterologous boost in Ad26.COV2.S vaccine recipients


Nicholas Kim Huat Khoo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joey Ming Er Lim[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Upkar S Gill[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ruklanthi de Alwis[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Nicole Tan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Justin Zhen Nan Toh[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jane E Abbott[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carla Usai[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eng Eong Ooi[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jenny Guek Hong Low[SUP] 1 3 4 [/SUP], Nina Le Bert[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Patrick T F Kennedy[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Antonio Bertoletti[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Protection offered by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines wanes over time, requiring an evaluation of different boosting strategies to revert such a trend and enhance the quantity and quality of Spike-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. These immunological parameters in homologous or heterologous vaccination boosts have thus far been studied for mRNA and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines, but knowledge on individuals who received a single dose of Ad26.COV2.S is lacking.
Methods: We studied Spike-specific humoral and cellular immunity in Ad26.COV2.S-vaccinated individuals (n = 55) who were either primed with Ad26.COV2.S only (n = 13) or were boosted with a homologous (Ad26.COV2.S, n = 28) or heterologous (BNT162b2, n = 14) second dose. We compared our findings with the results found in individuals vaccinated with a single (n = 16) or double (n = 44) dose of BNT162b2.
Findings: We observed that a strategy of heterologous vaccination enhanced the quantity and breadth of both Spike-specific humoral and cellular immunity in Ad26.COV2.S-vaccinated individuals. In contrast, the impact of the homologous boost was quantitatively minimal in Ad26.COV2.S-vaccinated individuals, and Spike-specific antibodies and T cells were narrowly focused to the S1 region.
Conclusions: Despite the small sample size of the study and the lack of well-defined correlates of protection against COVID-19, the immunological features detected support the utilization of a heterologous vaccine boost in individuals who received Ad26.COV2.S vaccination.
Funding: This study is partially supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its COVID-19 Research Fund (COVID19RF3-0060, COVID19RF-001, and COVID19RF-008), The Medical College St. Bartholomew's Hospital Trustees - Pump Priming Fund for SMD COVID-19 Research.

Keywords: Adenovirus vector; COVID-19; antiviral immunity; heterologous immunity; vaccines.
 
Back
Top Bottom