Mary Wilson
Well-known member
KF Walker, K O'Donoghue, N Grace, J Dorling, JL Comeau, W Li, JG Thornton
First published: 12 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16362
Abstract
Background
Early reports of COVID‐19 in pregnancy described management by caesarean, strict isolation of the neonate and formula feeding. Is this practice justified?
Objective
To estimate the risk of the neonate becoming infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 by mode of delivery, type of infant feeding and mother‐infant interaction.
Search strategy
Two biomedical databases were searched between September 2019 and June 2020.
Selection criteria
Case reports or case series of pregnant women with confirmed COVID‐19, where neonatal outcomes were reported.
Data collection and analysis
Data were extracted on mode of delivery, infant infection status, infant feeding and mother–infant interaction. For reported infant infection, a critical analysis was performed to evaluate the likelihood of vertical transmission.
Main results
Forty nine studies included information on mode of delivery and infant infection status for 655 women and 666 neonates. In all, 28/666 (4%) tested positive postnatally. Of babies born vaginally, 8/292 (2.7%) tested positivecompared with 20/374 (5.3%) born by Caesarean. Information on feeding and baby separation were often missing, but of reported breastfed babies 7/148 (4.7%) tested positive compared with 3/56 (5.3%) for reported formula fed ones. Of babies reported as nursed with their mother 4/107 (3.7%) tested positive, compared with 6/46 (13%) for those who were reported as isolated.
Conclusions
Neonatal COVID‐19 infection is uncommon, rarely symptomatic, and the rate of infection is no greater when the baby is born vaginally, breastfed or remains with the mother.
Tweetable abstract
Risk of neonatal infection with COVID‐19 by delivery route, infant feeding and mother‐baby interaction.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.16362
First published: 12 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16362
Abstract
Background
Early reports of COVID‐19 in pregnancy described management by caesarean, strict isolation of the neonate and formula feeding. Is this practice justified?
Objective
To estimate the risk of the neonate becoming infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 by mode of delivery, type of infant feeding and mother‐infant interaction.
Search strategy
Two biomedical databases were searched between September 2019 and June 2020.
Selection criteria
Case reports or case series of pregnant women with confirmed COVID‐19, where neonatal outcomes were reported.
Data collection and analysis
Data were extracted on mode of delivery, infant infection status, infant feeding and mother–infant interaction. For reported infant infection, a critical analysis was performed to evaluate the likelihood of vertical transmission.
Main results
Forty nine studies included information on mode of delivery and infant infection status for 655 women and 666 neonates. In all, 28/666 (4%) tested positive postnatally. Of babies born vaginally, 8/292 (2.7%) tested positivecompared with 20/374 (5.3%) born by Caesarean. Information on feeding and baby separation were often missing, but of reported breastfed babies 7/148 (4.7%) tested positive compared with 3/56 (5.3%) for reported formula fed ones. Of babies reported as nursed with their mother 4/107 (3.7%) tested positive, compared with 6/46 (13%) for those who were reported as isolated.
Conclusions
Neonatal COVID‐19 infection is uncommon, rarely symptomatic, and the rate of infection is no greater when the baby is born vaginally, breastfed or remains with the mother.
Tweetable abstract
Risk of neonatal infection with COVID‐19 by delivery route, infant feeding and mother‐baby interaction.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.16362