tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Life (Basel)
. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):975.
doi: 10.3390/life12070975.
Sublingual Vaccination with Live Influenza Virus Induces Better Protection Than Oral Immunization in Mice
Jie Mao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gi-Deok Eom[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Keon-Woong Yoon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hae-Ji Kang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ki-Back Chu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Fu-Shi Quan[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Both sublingual (SL) and oral vaccine administration modalities are convenient, easy, and safe. Here, we have investigated the differences in vaccine efficacy that are induced by oral and sublingual immunization with live influenza virus (A/Hong Kong/1/1968, H3N2) in mice. Intranasally administering a lethal dose of the influenza virus resulted in the deaths of the mice, whereas viral replication in the lungs did not occur upon SL or oral administration. At 30 days post-immunization through the SL or oral route, the mice were intranasally challenge-infected with the lethal dose of the homologous influenza virus. Both SL and oral immunizations with the influenza virus elicited significantly higher levels of virus-specific IgG and IgA antibody responses, as well as HAI titers in the sera. Upon challenge infection, the SL immunization elicited higher levels of pulmonary IgG antibody and CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T cell responses than the oral immunization. Enhanced splenic germinal center B (GC B) and B cell proliferation were also detected from the SL immunization, both of which were significantly greater than those of the oral immunization. Importantly, compared to oral immunization, significantly lessened lung viral loads and bodyweight reductions were observed from the SL immunization and these parameters contributed to prolonging the survival of the immunized mice. These results indicate that both SL and oral administration could be effective routes in inducing protective immunity against influenza virus infection, with SL immunization being the better of the two delivery routes.
Keywords: influenza virus; oral administration; protection; sublingual administration.
. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):975.
doi: 10.3390/life12070975.
Sublingual Vaccination with Live Influenza Virus Induces Better Protection Than Oral Immunization in Mice
Jie Mao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gi-Deok Eom[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Keon-Woong Yoon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hae-Ji Kang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ki-Back Chu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Fu-Shi Quan[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35888065
- PMCID: PMC9321673
- DOI: 10.3390/life12070975
Abstract
Both sublingual (SL) and oral vaccine administration modalities are convenient, easy, and safe. Here, we have investigated the differences in vaccine efficacy that are induced by oral and sublingual immunization with live influenza virus (A/Hong Kong/1/1968, H3N2) in mice. Intranasally administering a lethal dose of the influenza virus resulted in the deaths of the mice, whereas viral replication in the lungs did not occur upon SL or oral administration. At 30 days post-immunization through the SL or oral route, the mice were intranasally challenge-infected with the lethal dose of the homologous influenza virus. Both SL and oral immunizations with the influenza virus elicited significantly higher levels of virus-specific IgG and IgA antibody responses, as well as HAI titers in the sera. Upon challenge infection, the SL immunization elicited higher levels of pulmonary IgG antibody and CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T cell responses than the oral immunization. Enhanced splenic germinal center B (GC B) and B cell proliferation were also detected from the SL immunization, both of which were significantly greater than those of the oral immunization. Importantly, compared to oral immunization, significantly lessened lung viral loads and bodyweight reductions were observed from the SL immunization and these parameters contributed to prolonging the survival of the immunized mice. These results indicate that both SL and oral administration could be effective routes in inducing protective immunity against influenza virus infection, with SL immunization being the better of the two delivery routes.
Keywords: influenza virus; oral administration; protection; sublingual administration.