• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet . Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet


. 2020 Dec 8;S0140-6736(20)32661-1.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32661-1. Online ahead of print.
Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK


Merryn Voysey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sue Ann Costa Clemens[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shabir A Madhi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lily Y Weckx[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Pedro M Folegatti[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Parvinder K Aley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brian Angus[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Vicky L Baillie[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Shaun L Barnabas[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Qasim E Bhorat[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Sagida Bibi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carmen Briner[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Paola Cicconi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Andrea M Collins[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Rachel Colin-Jones[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Clare L Cutland[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Thomas C Darton[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Keertan Dheda[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Christopher J A Duncan[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Katherine R W Emary[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katie J Ewer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Lee Fairlie[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Saul N Faust[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Shuo Feng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniela M Ferreira[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Adam Finn[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Anna L Goodman[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Catherine M Green[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Christopher A Green[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Paul T Heath[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Catherine Hill[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Helen Hill[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Ian Hirsch[SUP] 21 [/SUP], Susanne H C Hodgson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alane Izu[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Susan Jackson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Daniel Jenkin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Carina C D Joe[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Simon Kerridge[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anthonet Koen[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Gaurav Kwatra[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Rajeka Lazarus[SUP] 23 [/SUP], Alison M Lawrie[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alice Lelliott[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vincenzo Libri[SUP] 24 [/SUP], Patrick J Lillie[SUP] 25 [/SUP], Raburn Mallory[SUP] 21 [/SUP], Ana V A Mendes[SUP] 26 [/SUP], Eveline P Milan[SUP] 27 [/SUP], Angela M Minassian[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alastair McGregor[SUP] 28 [/SUP], Hazel Morrison[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yama F Mujadidi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anusha Nana[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Peter J O'Reilly[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sherman D Padayachee[SUP] 29 [/SUP], Ana Pittella[SUP] 30 [/SUP], Emma Plested[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katrina M Pollock[SUP] 31 [/SUP], Maheshi N Ramasamy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sarah Rhead[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alexandre V Schwarzbold[SUP] 32 [/SUP], Nisha Singh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew Smith[SUP] 33 [/SUP], Rinn Song[SUP] 34 [/SUP], Matthew D Snape[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eduardo Sprinz[SUP] 35 [/SUP], Rebecca K Sutherland[SUP] 36 [/SUP], Richard Tarrant[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Emma C Thomson[SUP] 37 [/SUP], M Est?e T?r?k[SUP] 38 [/SUP], Mark Toshner[SUP] 39 [/SUP], David P J Turner[SUP] 40 [/SUP], Johan Vekemans[SUP] 21 [/SUP], Tonya L Villafana[SUP] 21 [/SUP], Marion E E Watson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Christopher J Williams[SUP] 41 [/SUP], Alexander D Douglas[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Adrian V S Hill[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Teresa Lambe[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sarah C Gilbert[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Andrew J Pollard[SUP] 42 [/SUP], Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial Group



Collaborators, Affiliations

Abstract

Background: A safe and efficacious vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), if deployed with high coverage, could contribute to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in a pooled interim analysis of four trials.
Methods: This analysis includes data from four ongoing blinded, randomised, controlled trials done across the UK, Brazil, and South Africa. Participants aged 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine or saline). Participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group received two doses containing 5 ? 10[SUP]10[/SUP] viral particles (standard dose; SD/SD cohort); a subset in the UK trial received a half dose as their first dose (low dose) and a standard dose as their second dose (LD/SD cohort). The primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 in seronegative participants with a nucleic acid amplification test-positive swab more than 14 days after a second dose of vaccine. Participants were analysed according to treatment received, with data cutoff on Nov 4, 2020. Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk derived from a robust Poisson regression model adjusted for age. Studies are registered at ISRCTN89951424 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606, NCT04400838, and NCT04444674.
Findings: Between April 23 and Nov 4, 2020, 23 848 participants were enrolled and 11 636 participants (7548 in the UK, 4088 in Brazil) were included in the interim primary efficacy analysis. In participants who received two standard doses, vaccine efficacy was 62?1% (95% CI 41?0-75?7; 27 [0?6%] of 4440 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group vs71 [1?6%] of 4455 in the control group) and in participants who received a low dose followed by a standard dose, efficacy was 90?0% (67?4-97?0; three [0?2%] of 1367 vs 30 [2?2%] of 1374; p[SUB]interaction[/SUB]=0?010). Overall vaccine efficacy across both groups was 70?4% (95?8% CI 54?8-80?6; 30 [0?5%] of 5807 vs 101 [1?7%] of 5829). From 21 days after the first dose, there were ten cases hospitalised for COVID-19, all in the control arm; two were classified as severe COVID-19, including one death. There were 74 341 person-months of safety follow-up (median 3?4 months, IQR 1?3-4?8): 175 severe adverse events occurred in 168 participants, 84 events in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 91 in the control group. Three events were classified as possibly related to a vaccine: one in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, one in the control group, and one in a participant who remains masked to group allocation.
Interpretation: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has an acceptable safety profile and has been found to be efficacious against symptomatic COVID-19 in this interim analysis of ongoing clinical trials.
Funding: UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Lemann Foundation, Rede D'Or, Brava and Telles Foundation, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca.
 
Back
Top Bottom