tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet Reg Health Eur
. 2022 Apr 22;100389.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100389. Online ahead of print.
Coronavirus vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated Austrians: Assessing underlying motivations and the effectiveness of interventions based on a cross-sectional survey with two embedded conjoint experiments
Tanja A Stamm[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Julia Partheymüller[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Erika Mosor[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Valentin Ritschl[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sylvia Kritzinger[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jakob-Moritz Eberl[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: To date, Austria is among the countries with the lowest coronavirus vaccination rates in Western Europe. It has announced the introduction of a general vaccine mandate but is experiencing an increasing societal polarization over this issue. We, therefore, aimed to provide evidence on the underlying motivations of vaccine hesitancy and evaluate what kinds of interventions - information, incentives, and rules - might increase vaccination readiness.
Method: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with a sample of 1,543 unvaccinated Austrian residents in October 2021, including two embedded conjoint experiments.
Findings: We screened 8,190 individuals to recruit the sample matching the Austrian micro-census. In experiment 1, easing rather than tightening of societal restrictions, a fixed monetary reward compared to a lottery and physicians' recommendations were associated with significantly higher intentions to get vaccinated. In experiment 2, standard approval by European or national authorities and simple information had a significant positive effect on vaccination propensity. Among the unvaccinated, fear of side effects, beliefs that comorbidities or the desire to have children would not allow vaccination, the assumption that the own immune system would provide sufficient protection, conspirational thinking (e.g., the refusal to participate in a 'large genetic experiment'), low trust in societal institutions, and spiritual beliefs were very common.
Interpretation: While many unvaccinated showed a low propensity to become vaccinated, we identified a cluster of 195 (23% of the participants without missing values) that could potentially be reached by information and incentives, including people with heightened comorbidity rates or a desire for children.
Funding: Vienna Science and Technology Fund.
Keywords: COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019; Conjoint experiment; Coronavirus; Cross-sectional survey; Interventions; Vaccine hesitancy.
. 2022 Apr 22;100389.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100389. Online ahead of print.
Coronavirus vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated Austrians: Assessing underlying motivations and the effectiveness of interventions based on a cross-sectional survey with two embedded conjoint experiments
Tanja A Stamm[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Julia Partheymüller[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Erika Mosor[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Valentin Ritschl[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sylvia Kritzinger[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jakob-Moritz Eberl[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35475036
- PMCID: PMC9023089
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100389
Abstract
Background: To date, Austria is among the countries with the lowest coronavirus vaccination rates in Western Europe. It has announced the introduction of a general vaccine mandate but is experiencing an increasing societal polarization over this issue. We, therefore, aimed to provide evidence on the underlying motivations of vaccine hesitancy and evaluate what kinds of interventions - information, incentives, and rules - might increase vaccination readiness.
Method: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with a sample of 1,543 unvaccinated Austrian residents in October 2021, including two embedded conjoint experiments.
Findings: We screened 8,190 individuals to recruit the sample matching the Austrian micro-census. In experiment 1, easing rather than tightening of societal restrictions, a fixed monetary reward compared to a lottery and physicians' recommendations were associated with significantly higher intentions to get vaccinated. In experiment 2, standard approval by European or national authorities and simple information had a significant positive effect on vaccination propensity. Among the unvaccinated, fear of side effects, beliefs that comorbidities or the desire to have children would not allow vaccination, the assumption that the own immune system would provide sufficient protection, conspirational thinking (e.g., the refusal to participate in a 'large genetic experiment'), low trust in societal institutions, and spiritual beliefs were very common.
Interpretation: While many unvaccinated showed a low propensity to become vaccinated, we identified a cluster of 195 (23% of the participants without missing values) that could potentially be reached by information and incentives, including people with heightened comorbidity rates or a desire for children.
Funding: Vienna Science and Technology Fund.
Keywords: COVID-19, Coronavirus Disease 2019; Conjoint experiment; Coronavirus; Cross-sectional survey; Interventions; Vaccine hesitancy.