• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet . Reactogenicity and immunogenicity after a late second dose or a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in the UK: a substudy of two randomised cont

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet


. 2021 Sep 1;S0140-6736(21)01699-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01699-8. Online ahead of print.
Reactogenicity and immunogenicity after a late second dose or a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in the UK: a substudy of two randomised controlled trials (COV001 and COV002)


Amy Flaxman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Natalie G Marchevsky[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daniel Jenkin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jeremy Aboagye[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Parvinder K Aley[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Brian Angus[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sagida Bibi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mustapha Bittaye[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Federica Cappuccini[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paola Cicconi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Elizabeth A Clutterbuck[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sophie Davies[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wanwisa Dejnirattisai[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Christina Dold[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Katie J Ewer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pedro M Folegatti[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jamie Fowler[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Adrian V S Hill[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Simon Kerridge[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Angela M Minassian[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Juthathip Mongkolsapaya[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Yama F Mujadidi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Emma Plested[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Maheshi N Ramasamy[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hannah Robinson[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Helen Sanders[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Emma Sheehan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Holly Smith[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Matthew D Snape[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rinn Song[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Danielle Woods[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Gavin Screaton[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sarah C Gilbert[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Merryn Voysey[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Andrew J Pollard[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Teresa Lambe[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Oxford COVID Vaccine Trial group



Collaborators, Affiliations

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 vaccine supply shortages are causing concerns about compromised immunity in some countries as the interval between the first and second dose becomes longer. Conversely, countries with no supply constraints are considering administering a third dose. We assessed the persistence of immunogenicity after a single dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222), immunity after an extended interval (44-45 weeks) between the first and second dose, and response to a third dose as a booster given 28-38 weeks after the second dose.
Methods: In this substudy, volunteers aged 18-55 years who were enrolled in the phase 1/2 (COV001) controlled trial in the UK and had received either a single dose or two doses of 5 × 10[SUP]10[/SUP] viral particles were invited back for vaccination. Here we report the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a delayed second dose (44-45 weeks after first dose) or a third dose of the vaccine (28-38 weeks after second dose). Data from volunteers aged 18-55 years who were enrolled in either the phase 1/2 (COV001) or phase 2/3 (COV002), single-blinded, randomised controlled trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and who had previously received a single dose or two doses of 5 × 10[SUP]10[/SUP] viral particles are used for comparison purposes. COV001 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606, and ISRCTN, 15281137, and COV002 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04400838, and ISRCTN, 15281137, and both are continuing but not recruiting.
Findings: Between March 11 and 21, 2021, 90 participants were enrolled in the third-dose boost substudy, of whom 80 (89%) were assessable for reactogenicity, 75 (83%) were assessable for evaluation of antibodies, and 15 (17%) were assessable for T-cells responses. The two-dose cohort comprised 321 participants who had reactogenicity data (with prime-boost interval of 8-12 weeks: 267 [83%] of 321; 15-25 weeks: 24 [7%]; or 44-45 weeks: 30 [9%]) and 261 who had immunogenicity data (interval of 8-12 weeks: 115 [44%] of 261; 15-25 weeks: 116 [44%]; and 44-45 weeks: 30 [11%]). 480 participants from the single-dose cohort were assessable for immunogenicity up to 44-45 weeks after vaccination. Antibody titres after a single dose measured approximately 320 days after vaccination remained higher than the titres measured at baseline (geometric mean titre of 66·00 ELISA units [EUs; 95% CI 47·83-91·08] vs 1·75 EUs [1·60-1·93]). 32 participants received a late second dose of vaccine 44-45 weeks after the first dose, of whom 30 were included in immunogenicity and reactogenicity analyses. Antibody titres were higher 28 days after vaccination in those with a longer interval between first and second dose than for those with a short interval (median total IgG titre: 923 EUs [IQR 525-1764] with an 8-12 week interval; 1860 EUs [917-4934] with a 15-25 week interval; and 3738 EUs [1824-6625] with a 44-45 week interval). Among participants who received a third dose of vaccine, antibody titres (measured in 73 [81%] participants for whom samples were available) were significantly higher 28 days after a third dose (median total IgG titre: 3746 EUs [IQR 2047-6420]) than 28 days after a second dose (median 1792 EUs [IQR 899-4634]; Wilcoxon signed rank test p=0·0043). T-cell responses were also boosted after a third dose (median response increased from 200 spot forming units [SFUs] per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs; IQR 127-389] immediately before the third dose to 399 SFUs per milion PBMCs [314-662] by day 28 after the third dose; Wilcoxon signed rank test p=0·012). Reactogenicity after a late second dose or a third dose was lower than reactogenicity after a first dose.
Interpretation: An extended interval before the second dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 leads to increased antibody titres. A third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induces antibodies to a level that correlates with high efficacy after second dose and boosts T-cell responses.
 
Back
Top Bottom