• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet Public Health . Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet Public Health


. 2020 Jul 30;S2468-2667(20)30164-X.
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X. Online ahead of print.
Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study


Long H Nguyen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David A Drew[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mark S Graham[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amit D Joshi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Chuan-Guo Guo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Wenjie Ma[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Raaj S Mehta[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Erica T Warner[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Daniel R Sikavi[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Chun-Han Lo[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Sohee Kwon[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mingyang Song[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lorelei A Mucci[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Meir J Stampfer[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Walter C Willett[SUP] 11 [/SUP], A Heather Eliassen[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Jaime E Hart[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Jorge E Chavarro[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Janet W Rich-Edwards[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Richard Davies[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Joan Capdevila[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Karla A Lee[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Mary Ni Lochlainn[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Thomas Varsavsky[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carole H Sudre[SUP] 3 [/SUP], M Jorge Cardoso[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jonathan Wolf[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Tim D Spector[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Sebastien Ourselin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Claire J Steves[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Andrew T Chan[SUP] 17 [/SUP], COronavirus Pandemic Epidemiology Consortium



Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

Background: Data for front-line health-care workers and risk of COVID-19 are limited. We sought to assess risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers compared with the general community and the effect of personal protective equipment (PPE) on risk.
Methods: We did a prospective, observational cohort study in the UK and the USA of the general community, including front-line health-care workers, using self-reported data from the COVID Symptom Study smartphone application (app) from March 24 (UK) and March 29 (USA) to April 23, 2020. Participants were voluntary users of the app and at first use provided information on demographic factors (including age, sex, race or ethnic background, height and weight, and occupation) and medical history, and subsequently reported any COVID-19 symptoms. We used Cox proportional hazards modelling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of our primary outcome, which was a positive COVID-19 test. The COVID Symptom Study app is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04331509.
Findings: Among 2 035 395 community individuals and 99 795 front-line health-care workers, we recorded 5545 incident reports of a positive COVID-19 test over 34 435 272 person-days. Compared with the general community, front-line health-care workers were at increased risk for reporting a positive COVID-19 test (adjusted HR 11?61, 95% CI 10?93-12?33). To account for differences in testing frequency between front-line health-care workers and the general community and possible selection bias, an inverse probability-weighted model was used to adjust for the likelihood of receiving a COVID-19 test (adjusted HR 3?40, 95% CI 3?37-3?43). Secondary and post-hoc analyses suggested adequacy of PPE, clinical setting, and ethnic background were also important factors.
Interpretation: In the UK and the USA, risk of reporting a positive test for COVID-19 was increased among front-line health-care workers. Health-care systems should ensure adequate availability of PPE and develop additional strategies to protect health-care workers from COVID-19, particularly those from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic backgrounds. Additional follow-up of these observational findings is needed.
Funding: Zoe Global, Wellcome Trust, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, National Institutes of Health Research, UK Research and Innovation, Alzheimer's Society, National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness.
 
Back
Top Bottom