• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet Psychiatry . Policy and public health implications for mental health after the COVID-19 pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet Psychiatry


. 2026 Feb;13(2):162-174.
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00358-X.
Policy and public health implications for mental health after the COVID-19 pandemic

Etheldreda Nakimuli-Mpungu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Celso Arango[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rakhi Dandona[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tamsin Ford[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ann John[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ayana Jordan[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Rebecca Cherop[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Lola Kola[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Carlos López-Jaramillo[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Alexandra M Schuster[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Martin Knapp[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Magdalena Walbaum[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Kelvin Opiepie[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Fabian Musoro[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Lawrence A White[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Dmytro Martsenkovskyi[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Benedict Daniel Michael[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Rory O'Connor[SUP] 16 [/SUP]; MQ Mental Health Research and The Lancet Psychiatry Standing Commission on the COVID-19 Pandemic and Mental Health; Peter B Jones[SUP] 4 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed essential weaknesses in mental health systems and intensified existing inequities, highlighting the need for a comprehensive assessment of policy responses and strategies for future resilience. Guided by four questions relating to system adaptations, approaches to inequities, financing strategies, and evidence gaps, we synthesised evidence from a structured literature search (2020-24), expert consultation, and lived experience. We found that public health systems embedded infodemic management, expanded digital services, and mobilised community workforces, but responses varied in equity and effectiveness. Although gender, age, socioeconomic, and racial disparities worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic, social protection, gender-sensitive policies, school-based services, and culturally adapted interventions showed promise. High-income countries buffered shocks with welfare measures while low-income and middle-income countries faced sharp fiscal constraints. Few studies evaluated cost-effectiveness or equity impacts of psychosocial interventions. Building resilient, equitable mental health systems requires integrated policies spanning communication, digital and community care, gender-responsive and youth-responsive strategies, and sustainable financing, alongside investment in longitudinal and cross-national research.


 
Back
Top