• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet Infect Dis . Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet Infect Dis


. 2020 Aug 3;S1473-3099(20)30589-2.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30589-2. Online ahead of print.
Risk of COVID-19 in health-care workers in Denmark: an observational cohort study


Kasper Iversen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Henning Bundgaard[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rasmus B Hasselbalch[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jonas H Kristensen[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pernille B Nielsen[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mia Pries-Heje[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Andreas D Knudsen[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Casper E Christensen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kamille Fogh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jakob B Norsk[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ove Andersen[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Thea K Fischer[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Claus Antonio Juul Jensen[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Margit Larsen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Christian Torp-Pedersen[SUP] 7 [/SUP], J?rgen Rungby[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Sisse B Ditlev[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Ida Hageman[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Rasmus M?gelvang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christoffer E Hother[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Mikkel Gybel-Brask[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Erik S?rensen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Lene Harritsh?j[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Fredrik Folke[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Curt Sten[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Thomas Benfield[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Susanne Dam Nielsen[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Henrik Ullum[SUP] 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Health-care workers are thought to be highly exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in health-care workers and the proportion of seroconverted health-care workers with previous symptoms of COVID-19.
Methods: In this observational cohort study, screening was offered to health-care workers in the Capital Region of Denmark, including medical, nursing, and other students who were associated with hospitals in the region. Screening included point-of-care tests for IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Test results and participant characteristics were recorded. Results were compared with findings in blood donors in the Capital Region in the study period.
Findings: Between April 15 and April 23, 2020, we screened 29 295 health-care workers, of whom 28 792 (98?28%) provided their test results. We identified 1163 (4?04% [95% CI 3?82-4?27]) seropositive health-care workers. Seroprevalence was higher in health-care workers than in blood donors (142 [3?04%] of 4672; risk ratio [RR] 1?33 [95% CI 1?12-1?58]; p<0?001). Seroprevalence was higher in male health-care workers (331 [5?45%] of 6077) than in female health-care workers (832 [3?66%] of 22 715; RR 1?49 [1?31-1?68]; p<0?001). Frontline health-care workers working in hospitals had a significantly higher seroprevalence (779 [4?55%] of 16 356) than health-care workers in other settings (384 [3?29%] of 11 657; RR 1?38 [1?22-1?56]; p<0?001). Health-care workers working on dedicated COVID-19 wards (95 [7?19%] of 1321) had a significantly higher seroprevalence than other frontline health-care workers working in hospitals (696 [4?35%] of 15 983; RR 1?65 [1?34-2?03]; p<0?001). 622 [53?5%] of 1163 seropositive participants reported symptoms attributable to SARS-CoV-2. Loss of taste or smell was the symptom that was most strongly associated with seropositivity (377 [32?39%] of 1164 participants with this symptom were seropositive vs 786 [2?84%] of 27 628 without this symptom; RR 11?38 [10?22-12?68]). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04356560.
Interpretation: The prevalence of health-care workers with antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was low but higher than in blood donors. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health-care workers was related to exposure to infected patients. More than half of seropositive health-care workers reported symptoms attributable to COVID-19.
Funding: Lundbeck Foundation.
 
Back
Top Bottom