• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet Infect Dis . Comparative assessment of immunogenicity and safety of recombinant influenza vaccine in children, adolescents, and adults: resul

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet Infect Dis


. 2025 May 21:S1473-3099(25)00153-7.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00153-7. Online ahead of print. Comparative assessment of immunogenicity and safety of recombinant influenza vaccine in children, adolescents, and adults: results from a phase 3, immunobridging, open-label, non-randomised study

Pedro M Folegatti[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephanie Pepin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cynthia Tabar[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Katherine Fries[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Oxana Talanova[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephanie See[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brandon Essink[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Todd Bertoch[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Daniel Drazan[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Silvina Natalini Martínez[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Marek Konieczny[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Kathleen Kaas-Leach[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Iris De Bruijn[SUP] 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) is licensed for adults older than 18 years but is not approved for paediatric groups. This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferior immune responses and safety of RIV in participants aged 9-17 years compared with adults aged 18-49 years.
Methods: This was a phase 3, non-randomised, immunobridging, open-label, uncontrolled study conducted at 36 centres in Europe and the USA during the 2022-23 northern hemisphere influenza season. The main exclusion criteria were receipt of an influenza vaccine up to 6 months before enrolment and receipt of any other vaccines within 4 weeks before or after study intervention (except for COVID-19 vaccination, which was allowed at least 2 weeks before or after enrolment). Healthy participants aged 9-49 years received a single dose of quadrivalent RIV and were followed up for 6 months on days 9, 29, and 181. Haemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays to assess immunogenicity were used to test blood samples obtained at baseline and day 29. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of immune response at day 29 as assessed by HAI titre ratios and differences in seroconversion rates between the two age groups. The non-inferiority of a geometric mean titre was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of the geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio was above 0·667 for each of the four strains of virus. Similarly, the non-inferiority of seroconversion was demonstrated if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI was -10% or above for each of four strains. Safety was monitored throughout the study. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05513053) and is complete.
Findings: Between Oct 27, 2022, and May 1, 2023, a total of 1308 participants were enrolled, all of whom attended the first study visit. 1299 participants (99%) received the study vaccine (641 participants [49%] in the age 9-17 years group and 658 participants [51%] in the age 18-49 years group). The mean age of participants in the age 9-17 years group was 13·0 years (SD 2·5) and was 34·3 years (9·2) in the age 18-49 years group. Overall, 707 participants (54%) were female and 601 participants (46%) were male. Most of the participants were White (1003 [77%] of 1308); the next largest category was Black or African American (255 [19%]); 149 (11%) participants identified as Hispanic or Latino. The HAI GMT ratio between the paediatric and adult groups at day 29 in the per-protocol analysis set was 2·0 (95% CI 1·7 to 2·3), 3·3 (2·8 to 3·9), 1·6 (1·4 to 1·8), and 1·2 (1·1 to 1·4) for A/H1N1, H3N2, B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata, respectively. Differences in seroconversion between the groups were 1·9 (-2·8 to 6·6), -0·6 (-4·4 to 3·2), 3·3 (-1·6 to 8·1), and 14·3 (9·2 to 19·3) for each of the four strains, respectively. The safety profile was comparable in both age groups, except for solicited reactions within 7 days post-vaccination that were fewer in children and adolescents (274 [44%] of 618; 95% CI 40 to 48) than in adults (336 [53%] of 635; 49 to 57). No related serious adverse events, deaths, or adverse events of special interest were reported.
Interpretation: RIV4 induced non-inferior immune responses in the participants aged 9-17 years compared with those aged 18-49 years. No safety concerns were reported.
Funding: Sanofi.


 
Back
Top Bottom