• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Lancet: Immunogenicity of chimeric haemagglutinin-based, universal influenza virus vaccine candidates: interim results of a randomised, placebo-contro

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 17. pii: S1473-3099(19)30393-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30393-7. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Immunogenicity of chimeric haemagglutinin-based, universal influenza virus vaccine candidates: interim results of a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial.[/h]
Bernstein DI[SUP]1[/SUP], Guptill J[SUP]2[/SUP], Naficy A[SUP]3[/SUP], Nachbagauer R[SUP]4[/SUP], Berlanda-Scorza F[SUP]3[/SUP], Feser J[SUP]3[/SUP], Wilson PC[SUP]5[/SUP], Sol?rzano A[SUP]4[/SUP], Van der Wielen M[SUP]6[/SUP], Walter EB[SUP]7[/SUP], Albrecht RA[SUP]8[/SUP], Buschle KN[SUP]1[/SUP], Chen YQ[SUP]9[/SUP], Claeys C[SUP]6[/SUP], Dickey M[SUP]1[/SUP], Dugan HL[SUP]10[/SUP], Ermler ME[SUP]11[/SUP], Freeman D[SUP]2[/SUP], Gao M[SUP]2[/SUP], Gast C[SUP]3[/SUP], Guthmiller JJ[SUP]9[/SUP], Hai R[SUP]12[/SUP], Henry C[SUP]9[/SUP], Lan LY[SUP]10[/SUP], McNeal M[SUP]1[/SUP], Palm AE[SUP]9[/SUP], Shaw DG[SUP]10[/SUP], Stamper CT[SUP]10[/SUP], Sun W[SUP]4[/SUP], Sutton V[SUP]2[/SUP], Tepora ME[SUP]9[/SUP], Wahid R[SUP]3[/SUP], Wenzel H[SUP]3[/SUP], Wohlbold TJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Innis BL[SUP]3[/SUP], Garc?a-Sastre A[SUP]13[/SUP], Palese P[SUP]14[/SUP], Krammer F[SUP]15[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 2 Duke Early Phase Clinical Research Unit, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA. 3 Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA, USA. 4 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 5 Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; The Committee on Immunology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 6 GlaxoSmithKline, Wavre, Belgium. 7 Duke Early Phase Clinical Research Unit, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 8 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 9 Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 10 The Committee on Immunology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 11 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA. 12 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA. 13 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 14 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 15 Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: florian.krammer@mssm.edu.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Influenza viruses cause substantial annual morbidity and mortality globally. Current vaccines protect against influenza only when well matched to the circulating strains. However, antigenic drift can cause considerable mismatches between vaccine and circulating strains, substantially reducing vaccine effectiveness. Moreover, current seasonal vaccines are ineffective against pandemic influenza, and production of a vaccine matched to a newly emerging virus strain takes months. Therefore, there is an unmet medical need for a broadly protective influenza virus vaccine. We aimed to test the ability of chimeric H1 haemagglutinin-based universal influenza virus vaccine candidates to induce broadly cross-reactive antibodies targeting the stalk domain of group 1 haemagglutinin-expressing influenza viruses.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We did a randomised, observer-blinded, phase 1 study in healthy adults in two centres in the USA. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three prime-boost, chimeric haemagglutinin-based vaccine regimens or one of two placebo groups. The vaccine regimens included a chimeric H8/1, intranasal, live-attenuated vaccine on day 1 followed by a non-adjuvanted, chimeric H5/1, intramuscular, inactivated vaccine on day 85; the same regimen but with the inactivated vaccine being adjuvanted with AS03; and an AS03-adjuvanted, chimeric H8/1, intramuscular, inactivated vaccine followed by an AS03-adjuvanted, chimeric H5/1, intramuscular, inactivated vaccine. In this planned interim analysis, the primary endpoints of reactogenicity and safety were assessed by blinded study group. We also assessed anti-H1 haemagglutinin stalk, anti-H2, anti-H9, and anti-H18 IgG antibody titres and plasmablast and memory B-cell responses in peripheral blood. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03300050.
[h=4]FINDINGS:[/h] Between Oct 10, 2017, and Nov 27, 2017, 65 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned. The adjuvanted inactivated vaccine, but not the live-attenuated vaccine, induced a substantial serum IgG antibody response after the prime immunisation, with a seven times increase in anti-H1 stalk antibody titres on day 29. After boost immunisation, all vaccine regimens induced detectable anti-H1 stalk antibody (2?2-5?6 times induction over baseline), cross-reactive serum IgG antibody, and peripheral blood plasmablast responses. An unsolicited adverse event was reported for 29 (48%) of 61 participants. Solicited local adverse events were reported in 12 (48%) of 25 participants following prime vaccination with intramuscular study product or placebo, in 12 (33%) of 36 after prime immunisation with intranasal study product or placebo, and in 18 (32%) of 56 following booster doses of study product or placebo. Solicited systemic adverse events were reported in 14 (56%) of 25 after prime immunisation with intramuscular study product or placebo, in 22 (61%) of 36 after immunisation with intranasal study product or placebo, and in 21 (38%) of 56 after booster doses of study product or placebo. Disaggregated safety data were not available at the time of this interim analysis.
[h=4]INTERPRETATION:[/h] The tested chimeric haemagglutinin-based, universal influenza virus vaccine regimens elicited cross-reactive serum IgG antibodies that targeted the conserved haemagglutinin stalk domain. This is the first proof-of-principle study to show that high anti-stalk titres can be induced by a rationally designed vaccine in humans and opens up avenues for further development of universal influenza virus vaccines. On the basis of the blinded study group, the vaccine regimens were tolerable and no safety concerns were observed.
[h=4]FUNDING:[/h] Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Copyright ? 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.


PMID: 31630990 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30393-7
Free full text
 
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 17. pii: S1473-3099(19)30556-0. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30556-0. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Turning influenza vaccinology on its head to reveal the stalk.[/h]
Valkenburg SA[SUP]1[/SUP], Cowling BJ[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 HKU-Pasteur Research Pole, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Electronic address: sophiev@hku.hk. 2 World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

PMID: 31630992 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30556-0
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom