• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Killer flu may not be the one we've feared

AlaskaDenise

In Memoriam
'Pandemic' points out that H5N1 bird flu isn't the only danger to public health.
June 4, 2007


"Pandemic," the Hallmark Channel, May 26.

The premise: On an island off the north coast of Australia, as surfer Charley Williams begins to cough, he is unaware that several dead seagulls and a dead dog lie near him. They are infected with a new form of flu virus, later determined to be an H3N7 mutated variant named "Riptide."

Fellow surfer Ames Smith leaves the island and boards a plane to Los Angeles. While on board, he develops a high fever, coughs up blood and dies. The plane and its passengers are quarantined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A passenger escapes and spreads the virus. Five days later, as several more passengers escape, L.A. has 154 dead and 1,400 sickening. Schools and shops are closed, paper masks are everywhere, mass graves are dug. The city is placed under quarantine.

The anti-viral drug "Tana-Flu" is found to be largely ineffective, and a more useful newer drug, "CoToxil," is in short supply. As Riptide spreads, the governor declares martial law and brings in the National Guard. The CDC finally determines that antibodies against tuberculosis bacteria prevent this virus from attaching to the lung, so the blood of TB survivors can be used as a vaccine. The world is saved.

The medical questions: Isn't the H5N1 bird flu our greatest risk for a massive pandemic? What is the typical incubation period for a deadly influenza? Are masks or quarantine effective? Is coughing up blood (hemoptysis) characteristic of a highly virulent influenza such as the devastating, 1918 Spanish flu or this new Riptide virus? Does a sudden "antigenic shift" (as a scientist suggests) bring about the pandemic because the public lacks immunity to the new virus? Can TB antibodies protect against a deadly flu?

The reality: Though the H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza strain has been much publicized and has worried many scientists, it is still primarily a disease in birds, and may not mutate sufficiently to cause the next human pandemic. "If we put all our eggs in this one basket, we can easily miss a mutation in a different virus which becomes the next pandemic strain," says flu researcher Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger of the National Institutes of Health. The movie sends an important message to the public when it shows a non-H5N1 influenza transforming into the pandemic virus.

The incubation time ? or period between exposure and the onset of symptoms ? for influenza is two to four days, sometimes longer. The film depicts this waiting period fairly accurately. In real life, scientists are not always sure exactly how influenza is transmitted, and it is unlikely that paper masks would provide much of a barrier to infection. More sophisticated N-95 respirator masks are only occasionally shown in the movie and must be fitted properly to be effective. The movie correctly illustrates the significant downside to quarantining whole regions (as opposed to the more effective strategy of isolating sick patients and their contacts), where people under suspicion become fearful and may take fewer precautions and thereby may spread the virus more widely.

The imagined Riptide virus, like the Spanish flu of 1918, kills a high percentage of older teens and young adults. Some scientists have theorized that this phenomenon is due to a hyperinflammatory response, which causes victims (often young and healthy) to drown in their own respiratory secretions. But Taubenberger believes that the high mortality in young adults in 1918 was likely due to an absence of immunity to the flu strain in those ages as compared to the older population who may have been exposed to a related virus earlier in life.

Coughing up blood is commonly associated with a virus that damages lungs so severely and quickly. But this doesn't happen as commonly as shown in the movie, where practically everyone infected is experiencing hemoptysis.

A virus experiencing a sudden antigenic shift or significant mutation is believed to be the cause of all pandemics. Bringing up this genetic term to explain the suddenly deadly Riptide" virus is a fine bit of scientific detail.

Less believable is the movie's optimistic portrayal of cooperating government officials, or the science-fiction contention that antibodies against tuberculosis can somehow prevent Riptide from attaching to lungs of potential victims. True, some immunity can be provided by extracting antibodies from the blood of survivors. In Asia, the blood of bird flu survivors has just been shown to protect mice from the disease. But TB is an entirely different disease. You wouldn't expect antibodies of TB sufferers to help fight flu.

Finally, viewers should know that the next flu pandemic may be mild, not massive. Not all pandemics kill many millions like the 1918 Spanish flu.

--


<HR width="20%">
Dr. Marc Siegel is an internist and an associate professor of medicine at New York University. In the Unreal World, he explains medical facts behind media fiction. He can be reached at marc@doctorsiegel.com.

http://www.latimes.com/features/hea...mn?coll=la-health-medicine&ctrack=1&cset=true

 
Re: Killer flu may not be the one we've feared

these concerns about other strains - we didn't see it last year.
Is the current danger from other strains higher than usual ?
Higher than the average of the last 50 years ?

WHO says:
> Experts at WHO and elsewhere believe that the world is now
> closer to another influenza pandemic than at any time since 1968
> The world is presently in phase 3: a new influenza virus subtype
> is causing disease in humans, but is not yet spreading efficiently
> and sustainably among humans.

they don't say which subtype, but I assume they mean H5N1.
Reasonably they should have a "phase" for every subtype,
but I can't find this. So I assume these experts at WHO are
currently not particularly concerned about other strains.
 
Re: Killer flu may not be the one we've feared

these concerns about other strains - we didn't see it last year.
Is the current danger from other strains higher than usual ?

Just because the main stream media doesn't pick up on these concerns does not mean that they have not been previously discussed and remain a concern in the scientific community. Please note the conclusions from the following research. While H9N2 may not be the killer that H5N1 currently is, it reflects more human characteristics in its gene segments. If it turns pandemic with a clinical infection rate of 30 plus percent, things will get really interesting. Low case fatality rates do not equate to low economic impact to world economies.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, Nov. 2005, p. 5760?5767 Vol. 43, No. 11
0095-1137/05/$08.000 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5760?5767.2005
Human Infection with an Avian H9N2 Influenza A Virus in
Hong Kong in 2003
K. M. Butt,1 Gavin J. D. Smith,1,2 Honglin Chen,1,2 L. J. Zhang,1,2 Y. H. Connie Leung,1
K. M. Xu,1,2 Wilina Lim,3 Robert G. Webster,1,4 K. Y. Yuen,1 J. S. Malik Peiris,1,2
and Yi Guan1,2*

"Given the predicted affinity of H9N2
viruses for -2,6-NeuAcGal receptors (8, 11, 19), they appear
to have the potential to cross the species barrier to humans
more efficiently than current H5N1 strains. The repeated introduction
of H9N2 virus into humans provides increased opportunities
for reassortment with human viruses and also increases
the likelihood that this virus will acquire the ability to
be transmitted from human to human. Two previous pandemic
strains (H2N2 in 1957 and H3N2 in 1968) were also derived
from viruses with low pathogenicities (10). Therefore, while
the impact of H5N1 disease in poultry and in humans in Asia
has been altogether more dramatic, it is important to have
H9N2 viruses high on the list of candidate human pandemic
strains and to carry out more studies on its ecology."

With strains that produce only mild disease, they can easily be overlooked as "seasonal flu". Wouldn't it be interesting if additional seroprevalence studies were undertaken to determine the extent of H9N2 infections in human populations?
 
Re: Killer flu may not be the one we've feared

Are there any human vaccines against H9N2?.

There is some awareness. Please note the following NIH article excerpt:

"H9N2 Avian Flu Vaccine Paired with Adjuvant Provokes Strong Human Immune Response at Low Doses

When combined with an immune-boosting substance called an adjuvant, low doses of an experimental vaccine against a strain of avian influenza (H9N2) provoked a strong antibody response in human volunteers, report scientists supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health.

The clinical trial of 96 adults was conducted at the NIAID-supported Viral Respiratory Pathogens Research Unit at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, and was led by Robert L. Atmar, M.D. The results are now online in Clinical Infectious Diseases."



http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/sep2006/niaid-25b.htm
 
Re: Killer flu may not be the one we've feared

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/search?term=h9n2

3 trials of NIAD and 1 of GSK

4 studies were found.

1. No longer recruiting
Safety of and Immune Response to a Bird Flu Virus Vaccine (H9N2) in Healthy Adults (Study A)
Conditions: Influenza; Virus Diseases

2. No longer recruiting
Inactivated Influenza A/H9N2 Vaccine With and Without MF59 Adjuvant in Ambulatory Adults
Condition: Influenza

3. No longer recruiting
Safety of and Immune Response to a Bird Flu Virus Vaccine (H9N2) in Healthy Adults (Study B)
Conditions: Influenza; Virus Diseases

4. Completed
Safety Study of Pandemic Candidate Influenza Vaccines in the Elderly Population
Condition: Influenza
 
Re: Killer flu may not be the one we've feared

So essentially ALL the potential pandemic AIs (H5N1, H7N7 or N2 or N3, H9N2, and for good measure - as the parent of H5N1 - we should throw in an H6N?) have woefully inadequate vaccine stocks/capability.

That should be enough candidates to keep both our children and grandchildren needing to prep.

.
 
Back
Top Bottom