• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JVI: Avian influenza H7N9/13 and H7N7/13: A comparative virulence study in chickens, pigeons, and ferrets

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Published ahead of print 4 June 2014, doi: 10.1128/JVI.01241-14 JVI.01241-14



Avian influenza H7N9/13 and H7N7/13: A comparative virulence study in chickens, pigeons, and ferrets

Donata Kalthoff,
Jessica Bogs,
Christian Grund,
Kerstin Tauscher,
Jens P. Teifke,
Elke Starick,
Timm Harder and
Martin Beer#

Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, S?dufer 10, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany

ABSTRACT

Human cases caused by a novel avian H7N9-virus in China emphasize the zoonotic potential of that subtype. We compared infectivity and pathogenicity of the novel H7N9-virus and a recent European avian H7N7-strain in chickens, pigeons and ferrets. Neither virus did induce signs of disease despite of substantial replication in inoculated chickens and rapid transmission to contact chickens. Evidence for replication of both viruses in pigeons, albeit at lower levels of RNA excretion, was also detected. No clear-cut differences between the two H7-isolates emerged regarding replication and antibody development in avian hosts. In ferrets, in contrast, enhanced replication of the avian H7N9-virus compared to the H7N7-strain was observed with significant differences of viral presence, e.g., in nasal washes, lung and cerebellum samples. Importantly, both viruses showed potential to spread into the brain of mammals. We conclude, that efficient asymptomatic viral replication and shedding as shown for the chickens facilitates spread of H7-viruses, which may harbor a zoonotic potential. Biosafety measures are required in handling poultry infected with avian influenza viruses of the H7 subtype independent of their pathogenicity for gallinaceous poultry.

Importance The study is important to the field since we provide data about the behavior of the novel H7N9 avian influenza virus in chickens, pigeons and ferrets in comparison to a recent low pathogenic H7N7-strain isolated from poultry. We clearly show that chickens, but not pigeons, are highly permissive hosts for both H7-viruses allowing high titer replication and virus shedding without any relevant clinical signs. In the ferret model, the potential for infecting mammals of both viruses could be demonstrated, including infection of the brain. However, replication efficiency of the H7N9-virus in ferrets was higher in comparison to the H7N7-strain. In conclusion, valuable data for the risk analysis of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses of the H7 subtype are provided which could be also used for the risk assessment of zoonotic potentials and necessary biosafety measures.


http://jvi.asm.org/content/early/2014/05/28/JVI.01241-14.abstract
 
Back
Top Bottom