• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Jama: Use of Intravenous Neuraminidase Inhibitors During the 2009 Pandemic: Results From Population-Based Surveillance

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Research Letter
JAMA. 2011;306(2):160-162. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.950
Use of Intravenous Neuraminidase Inhibitors During the 2009 Pandemic: Results From Population-Based Surveillance

Alicia M. Fry, MD, MPH;
Alejandro P?rez, MPH;
Lyn Finelli, DPH

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.




To the Editor: During 2009, neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) were recommended for treatment of pandemic influenza A virus (pH1N1) infection 1; oral oseltamivir and inhaled zanamivir are the only licensed NAIs in the United States. During the pandemic, 2 experimental intravenous (IV) NAIs, zanamivir and peramivir, were available by emergency investigational new drug or emergency use authorization request. 2, 3 We report the frequency and characteristics of patients who received an experimental IV NAI from a population-based, active surveillance of hospitalized patients.
Methods

We identified patients with laboratory-confirmed pH1N1 infection from the Emerging Infections Program Influenza-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance. The surveillance area includes 22 million adults and children from select counties in 10 states that represent approximately 7% of the US population. 4, 5 Hospitalization associated with pH1N1 was defined as laboratory-confirmed influenza (pH1N1 or influenza A unsubtyped) in a patient admitted to a hospital in the surveillance area between ?


http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/2/160.extract
 
Re: Jama: Use of Intravenous Neuraminidase Inhibitors During the 2009 Pandemic: Results From Population-Based Surveillance

Report shows rarity of IV antiviral use during 2009 pandemic
A letter report in today's Journal of the American Medical Association makes clear how rarely intravenous (IV) antiviral drugs were used during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Two IV antivirals, zanamivir and peramivir, were made available under emergency investigational new drug and emergency use authorization rules. Researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gathered data on use of the drugs through the Emerging Infections Program, using a surveillance area including selected counties in 10 states and having a population of about 2.2 million. They identified 7,759 patients with confirmed 2009 H1N1 who were hospitalized between April 2009 and April 2010. Of 6,216 (80%) patients who received an antiviral, only 41, including 38 adults and 3 children, received an IV drug. Peramivir was used in 33 patients and zanamivir in 8. A shortage of data on effectiveness and safety in severely ill patients and children may have discouraged use of the IV formulations, the report says. Death rates were 27% (11 of 41) in patients who received the IV drugs and 3% (174 of 6,175) in those treated with the licensed drugs. But the researchers say they could not assess the effectiveness of the medications, as those who received them tended to be more severely ill and obese, and no adequate comparison group was available.
Jul 13 JAMA letter report

http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/swineflu/news/jul1311fluscan.html
 
Back
Top Bottom