tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
JAMA Netw Open
. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347630.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47630. Electronically Delivered Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccination Uptake in Older Adults With Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the NUDGE-FLU Trial
Mats C Højbjerg Lassen[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Muthiah Vaduganathan[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Ankeet S Bhatt[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Simin Gharib Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Erica L Dueger[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Sandrine I Samson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Michael Fralick[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lars Køber[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 9 11 [/SUP], Cyril Jean-Marie Martel[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Tyra Grove Krause[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Importance: Influenza vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in patients with diabetes, but vaccination rates remain suboptimal.
Objective: To assess the effect of electronic nudges on influenza vaccination uptake according to diabetes status.
Design, setting, and participants: The NUDGE-FLU (Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic Letter System for Increasing Influenza Vaccine Uptake) trial was a nationwide clinical trial of Danish citizens 65 years or older that randomized participants at the household level to usual care or 9 different electronic nudge letters during the 2022 to 2023 influenza season. End of follow-up was January 1, 2023. This secondary analysis of the NUDGE-FLU trial was performed from May to July 2023.
Intervention: Nine different electronic nudge letters designed to boost influenza vaccination were sent in September to October 2022. Effect modification by diabetes status was assessed in a pooled analysis of all intervention arms vs usual care and for individual letters.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was receipt of a seasonal influenza vaccine.
Results: The trial included 964 870 participants (51.5% female; mean [SD] age, 73.8 [6.3] years); 123 974 had diabetes. During follow-up, 83.5% with diabetes vs 80.2% without diabetes received a vaccine (P < .001). In the pooled analysis, nudges improved vaccination uptake in participants without diabetes (80.4% vs 80.0%; difference, 0.37 percentage points; 99.55% CI, 0.08 to 0.66), whereas there was no evidence of effect in those with diabetes (83.4% vs 83.6%; difference, -0.19 percentage points; 99.55% CI, -0.89 to 0.51) (P = .02 for interaction). In the main results of NUDGE-FLU, 2 of the 9 behaviorally designed letters (cardiovascular benefits letter and a repeated letter) significantly increased uptake of influenza vaccination vs usual care; these benefits similarly appeared attenuated in participants with diabetes (cardiovascular gain letter: 83.7% vs 83.6%; difference, 0.04 percentage points; 99.55% CI, -1.52 to 1.60; repeated letter: 83.5% vs 83.6%; difference, -0.15 percentage points; 99.55% CI, -1.71 to 1.41) vs those without diabetes (cardiovascular gain letter: 81.1% vs 80.0%; difference, 1.06 percentage points; 99.55% CI, 0.42 to 1.70; repeated letter: 80.9% vs 80.0%; difference, 0.87 percentage points; 99.55% CI, 0.22 to 1.52) (P = .07 for interaction).
Conclusions and relevance: In this exploratory subgroup analysis, electronic nudges improved influenza vaccination uptake in persons without diabetes, whereas there was no evidence of an effect in persons with diabetes. Trials are needed to investigate the effect of digital nudges specifically tailored to individuals with diabetes.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05542004.
. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347630.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47630. Electronically Delivered Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccination Uptake in Older Adults With Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the NUDGE-FLU Trial
Mats C Højbjerg Lassen[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Muthiah Vaduganathan[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Ankeet S Bhatt[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Simin Gharib Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Erica L Dueger[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Sandrine I Samson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Michael Fralick[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lars Køber[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 9 11 [/SUP], Cyril Jean-Marie Martel[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Tyra Grove Krause[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38117499
- PMCID: PMC10733794
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47630
Importance: Influenza vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of mortality in patients with diabetes, but vaccination rates remain suboptimal.
Objective: To assess the effect of electronic nudges on influenza vaccination uptake according to diabetes status.
Design, setting, and participants: The NUDGE-FLU (Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic Letter System for Increasing Influenza Vaccine Uptake) trial was a nationwide clinical trial of Danish citizens 65 years or older that randomized participants at the household level to usual care or 9 different electronic nudge letters during the 2022 to 2023 influenza season. End of follow-up was January 1, 2023. This secondary analysis of the NUDGE-FLU trial was performed from May to July 2023.
Intervention: Nine different electronic nudge letters designed to boost influenza vaccination were sent in September to October 2022. Effect modification by diabetes status was assessed in a pooled analysis of all intervention arms vs usual care and for individual letters.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was receipt of a seasonal influenza vaccine.
Results: The trial included 964 870 participants (51.5% female; mean [SD] age, 73.8 [6.3] years); 123 974 had diabetes. During follow-up, 83.5% with diabetes vs 80.2% without diabetes received a vaccine (P < .001). In the pooled analysis, nudges improved vaccination uptake in participants without diabetes (80.4% vs 80.0%; difference, 0.37 percentage points; 99.55% CI, 0.08 to 0.66), whereas there was no evidence of effect in those with diabetes (83.4% vs 83.6%; difference, -0.19 percentage points; 99.55% CI, -0.89 to 0.51) (P = .02 for interaction). In the main results of NUDGE-FLU, 2 of the 9 behaviorally designed letters (cardiovascular benefits letter and a repeated letter) significantly increased uptake of influenza vaccination vs usual care; these benefits similarly appeared attenuated in participants with diabetes (cardiovascular gain letter: 83.7% vs 83.6%; difference, 0.04 percentage points; 99.55% CI, -1.52 to 1.60; repeated letter: 83.5% vs 83.6%; difference, -0.15 percentage points; 99.55% CI, -1.71 to 1.41) vs those without diabetes (cardiovascular gain letter: 81.1% vs 80.0%; difference, 1.06 percentage points; 99.55% CI, 0.42 to 1.70; repeated letter: 80.9% vs 80.0%; difference, 0.87 percentage points; 99.55% CI, 0.22 to 1.52) (P = .07 for interaction).
Conclusions and relevance: In this exploratory subgroup analysis, electronic nudges improved influenza vaccination uptake in persons without diabetes, whereas there was no evidence of an effect in persons with diabetes. Trials are needed to investigate the effect of digital nudges specifically tailored to individuals with diabetes.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05542004.