• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JAMA - Effect of Varying Doses of a Monovalent H7N9 Influenza Vaccine With and Without AS03 and MF59 Adjuvants on Immune Response: A Randomized Clini

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
[h=1]Effect of Varying Doses of a Monovalent H7N9 Influenza Vaccine With and Without AS03 and MF59 Adjuvants on Immune Response: A Randomized Clinical Trial[/h] Lisa A. Jackson, MD, MPH[SUP]1[/SUP]; James D. Campbell, MD, MS[SUP]2[/SUP]; Sharon E. Frey, MD[SUP]3[/SUP]; Kathryn M. Edwards, MD[SUP]4[/SUP]; Wendy A. Keitel, MD[SUP]5[/SUP]; Karen L. Kotloff, MD[SUP]2[/SUP]; Andrea A. Berry, MD[SUP]2[/SUP]; Irene Graham, MD[SUP]3[/SUP]; Robert L Atmar, MD[SUP]5[/SUP]; C. Buddy Creech, MD, MPH[SUP]4[/SUP]; Isaac P. Thomsen, MD[SUP]4[/SUP]; Shital M. Patel, MD[SUP]5[/SUP]; Andres F. Gutierrez, MD[SUP]5[/SUP]; Edwin L. Anderson, MD[SUP]3[/SUP]; Hana M. El Sahly, MD[SUP]5[/SUP]; Heather Hill, MS[SUP]6[/SUP]; Diana L. Noah, PhD[SUP]7[/SUP]; Abbie R. Bellamy, PhD[SUP]6[/SUP]
[+] Author Affiliations
JAMA. 2015;314(3):237-246. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.7916.
Text Size: A A A






[h=2]ABSTRACT[/h]

Importance Human infections with the avian influenza A(H7N9) virus were first reported in China in 2013 and continue to occur. Hemagglutinin H7 administered alone is a poor immunogen necessitating evaluation of adjuvanted H7N9 vaccines.
Objective To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated H7N9 vaccine with and without AS03 adjuvant, as well as mixed vaccine schedules that included sequential administration of AS03- and MF59-containing formulations and of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted formulations.
Design, Setting, and Participants Double-blind, phase 2 trial at 5 US sites enrolled 980 adults aged 19 through 64 years from September 2013 through November 2013; safety follow-up was completed in January 2015.
Interventions The H7N9 vaccine was given on days 0 and 21 at nominal doses of 3.75 ?g, 7.5 ?g, 15 ?g, and 45 ?g of hemagglutinin with or without AS03 or MF59 adjuvant mixed on site.
Main Outcomes and Measures Proportions achieving a hemagglutination inhibition antibody (HIA) titer of 40 or higher at 21 days after the second vaccination; vaccine-related serious adverse events through 12 months after the first vaccination; and solicited signs and symptoms after vaccination through day 7.
Results Two doses of vaccine were required to induce detectable antibody titers in most participants. After 2 doses of an H7N9 formulation containing 15 ?g of hemagglutinin given without adjuvant, with AS03 adjuvant, or with MF59 adjuvant, the proportion achieving an HIA titer of 40 or higher was 2% (95% CI, 0%-7%) without adjuvant (n = 94), 84% (95% CI, 76%-91%) with AS03 adjuvant (n = 96), and 57% (95% CI, 47%-68%) with MF59 adjuvant (n = 92) (P < .001 for comparison of the AS03 and MF59 schedules). The 2 schedules alternating AS03-and MF59-adjuvanted formulations led to lower geometric mean titers (GMTs) of (41.5 [95% CI, 31.7-54.4]; n = 92) and (58.6 [95% CI, 44.3-77.6]; n = 96) than the group induced by 2 AS03-adjuvanted formulations (n = 96) (103.4 [95% CI, 78.7-135.9]; P < .001) but higher GMTs than 2 doses of MF59-adjuvanted formulation (n = 94) (29.0 [95% CI, 22.4-37.6]; P < .001).
Conclusions and Relevance The AS03 and MF59 adjuvants augmented the immune responses to 2 doses of an inactivated H7N9 influenza vaccine, with AS03-adjuvanted formulations inducing the highest titers. This study of 2 adjuvants used in influenza vaccine formulations with adjuvant mixed on site provides immunogenicity information that may be informative to influenza pandemic preparedness programs.
Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01942265

http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2397832
 
Back
Top Bottom