• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JAAD Int . Pityriasis Rosea-like Rash after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JAAD Int


. 2022 Feb 9.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.01.009. Online ahead of print.
Pityriasis Rosea-like Rash after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report and Review of the Literature


Jordan E Buckley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura N Landis[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ronald P Rapini[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

A spectrum of cutaneous reactions to SARs-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines have been reported in the literature.[SUP]1[/SUP] We present a case of a pityriasis rosea-like rash occurring after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination and review cases of pityriasis rosea (PR)/ pityriasis rosea-like eruption (PR-LE) after mRNA COVID-19 vaccine published in the medical literature. Of the 30 cases found, none experienced severe adverse effects and the rash resolved in an average of 5.6 weeks. It is important for physicians to be aware of this self-limited reaction so they can reassure and appropriately counsel patients that it is safe to receive subsequent vaccine doses despite the cutaneous eruption. Additionally, differences in incidence of this reaction after Pfizer and Moderna vaccination may suggest a differing host immune response incited by these vaccines which warrants further investigation.

Keywords: COVID-19; Moderna; Pfizer; Pityriasis rosea (PR); Pityriasis rosea-like eruption (PR-LE); coronavirus; dermatology; mRNA vaccine; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom