• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Womens Health (Larchmt) . Pregnant Women's Opinions and Acceptance of Influenza and Tdap Vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Womens Health (Larchmt)


. 2022 Feb 25.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0365. Online ahead of print.
Pregnant Women's Opinions and Acceptance of Influenza and Tdap Vaccines


Alice G Callahan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emmie R Strassberg[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Courtney P Rhoades[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lisa Varghese[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jay Schulkin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michael L Power[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccinations during pregnancy protect mother and infant. However, acceptance of these vaccines during pregnancy is suboptimal, especially among Black women in the United States. We characterize vaccine intentions and opinions of pregnant patients at two prenatal care clinics before and after reading informational text. Methods: A survey was distributed to pregnant patients at prenatal clinics in Winchester, Virginia, and Jacksonville, Florida. The survey assessed patient demographics and vaccine opinions and acceptance before and after patients read informational text about the vaccines. Associations between demographics and vaccine opinions and acceptance were assessed using Chi-square; Principal Component Analysis was used to produce an influenza vaccine opinion score. Differences in the opinion score between groups were assessed by ANOVA and ANCOVA. Results: Respondents (n = 654) who identified as Black and with lower educational attainment reported lower receipt of the influenza vaccine outside of pregnancy and receipt of or plans to receive the influenza and Tdap vaccines during pregnancy (p < 0.001). Respondents' influenza vaccine practices outside of pregnancy were associated with their likelihood of getting the vaccine while pregnant. Most respondents found the informational text useful; among women not yet vaccinated, 26% reported they were more likely to receive the influenza vaccine and 49.9% more likely to receive the Tdap vaccine after reading the text. Conclusions: Women have varying opinions and make different decisions about immunization, with race and educational level being significant correlates. Participants generally welcomed information about vaccines, and many were influenced positively, especially for Tdap.

Keywords: immunization; prenatal care; racial disparity; vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom