• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Virol Methods . Evaluation of the analytical performance and specificity of a SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification assay

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Virol Methods


. 2021 May 10;114182.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114182. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of the analytical performance and specificity of a SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification assay


Markus Schneider[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Thomas Iftner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tina Ganzenmueller[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

The ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic requires fast and accurate high-throughput diagnostic tools. To evaluate the analytical performance of the Hologic Aptima transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from respiratory samples we analysed 103 clinical and proficiency panel samples pre-tested by real-time RT-PCR (Altona, RealStar) and found a positive percent agreement (sensitivity) of 95.7% and a negative percent agreement (specificity) of 100%. The limit of detection of the Aptima test was 150 copies/ml determined as 95% detection probability. To further assess the Aptima assay?s specificity we prospectively analysed 7545 clinical specimens from the upper and lower respiratory tract sent for the purpose of routine SARS-CoV-2 screening. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 16/7545 (0.2%) samples by the TMA assay and confirmed independently by the Xpert SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR (Cepheid); in one case a previous discrepant result was confirmed as true SARS-CoV-2 infection in a subsequent sample from the same patient. Results from the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 TMA assay agreed well with RT-PCR and showed an excellent specificity in a large number of routine specimens despite the low prevalence at that time of the pandemic, indicating that this assay can be used even for screening purposes.

Keywords: Aptima; SARS-CoV-2; limit of detection; screening; specificity; transcription-mediated amplification.
 
Back
Top Bottom