• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Virol Methods. Dry cotton or flocked respiratory swabs as a simple collection technique for the molecular detection of respiratory viruses using rea

Giuseppe

Emeritus
J Virol Methods. 2008 Nov;153(2):84-9. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

Dry cotton or flocked respiratory swabs as a simple collection technique for the molecular detection of respiratory viruses using real-time NASBA.

Moore C, Corden S, Sinha J, Jones R. - Wales Specialist Virology Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW, United Kingdom. catherine.moore@nphs.wales.nhs.uk

This paper describes the molecular detection of influenza A, influenza B, respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus using real-time nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) from respiratory samples collected on simple dry cotton swabs, non-invasively and in the absence of transport medium.
Viral RNA was detectable on dry cotton and flocked swabs for at least 2 weeks at room temperature and was readily extracted using magnetic silica extraction methods.
Dry cotton respiratory swabs were matched with traditionally collected respiratory samples from the same patient, and results of traditional laboratory techniques and real-time NASBA were compared for all four viral targets.
The results not only showed a significant increase in the detection rate of the viral targets over traditional laboratory methods of 46%, but also that dry swabs did not compromise their recovery.
Over two subsequent winter seasons, 736 dry cotton respiratory swabs were collected from symptomatic patients and tested using real-time NASBA giving an overall detection rate for these respiratory virus targets of 38%.
The simplicity of the method together with the increased detection rate observed in the study proves that transporting a dry respiratory swab to the laboratory for respiratory virus diagnosis using molecular methods is a suitable and robust alternative to traditional sample types.

PMID: 18761378 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
-
------
 
Back
Top