• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Transl Autoimmun . Benefits of early aggressive immunomodulatory therapy (tocilizumab and methylprednisolone) in COVID-19: Single center cohort st

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Transl Autoimmun


. 2021;4:100086.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100086. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
Benefits of early aggressive immunomodulatory therapy (tocilizumab and methylprednisolone) in COVID-19: Single center cohort study of 685 patients


Buzon-Mart?n Luis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Montero-Balad?a Miguel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Delgado-L?pez Pedro[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Iglesias-Posadilla David[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Astigarraga Itziar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Galacho-Harriero Ana[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Iglesias-Juli?n Enrique[SUP] 5 [/SUP], L?pez-Veloso Mar?a[SUP] 5 [/SUP], De La Torre-Ferrera Noelia[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Barraza-Bengoechea Julio C?sar[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ubeira-Iglesias Marta[SUP] 6 [/SUP], San Llorente-Sebasti?n Rodrigo[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Colazo-Burlato Mar?a[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lorenzo-Mart?n Andr?s[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Minguito de la Iglesia Javier[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Garc?a-Mu?oz Juan Pablo[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hermida-Fern?ndez Gerardo[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Navarro-San Francisco Carolina[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Boado-Lama Jorge[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Fern?ndez-Regueras Mar?a[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Callejo-Torre Fernando[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ossa-Echeverri Sergio[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Fisac-Cuadrado Lourdes[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Gero-Escapa Mar?a[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Meg?as-Lob?n Gregoria[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Sim?n-Rodr?guez Adolfo[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Fern?ndez-Ratero Jos? Antonio[SUP] 2 [/SUP], HUBU-COVID-19 group



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction: A growing evidence suggests that immune dysregulation and thrombotic phenomena are key features in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Apart from antivirals and respiratory support, anticoagulants, corticoids and immunomodulators are increasingly being prescribed, especially for more severe cases. We describe the clinical outcome of a large cohort of patients preferentially treated with glucocorticoids and interleukin inhibitors.
Methods: Single center and retrospective case series. Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 related respiratory insufficiency were included. Patients who died within 2 days after admission and those testing positive but asymptomatic were excluded. We defined two study periods: from March 3rd to March 31 st, 2020 (beginning of epidemic until peak of incidence) and April 1 st to May 7 th, 2020 (second half of epidemic). The majority of patients received respiratory support, combinations of antimicrobials, anticoagulants, corticoids and interleukin inhibitors. Antivirals were preferentially given in the first period. The clinical outcome (death and ventilator dependency) of both periods was compared.
Results: From March 3 rd to May 7 th, 685 patients were included for analysis (58.4% males, mean age 68.9 years). Patients in the first period (n ​= ​408) were younger (66.6 vs 71.1 years, p ​= ​0.003), presented lower mean P a O 2/F i O2 ratio at admission (256.5 vs 270.4 ​mm Hg,p ​= ​0.0563), higher ferritin (1520 vs 1221 ​ng/ml, p ​= ​0.01), higher IL-6 (679 vs 194 ​pg/ml, p ​< ​0.0001) and similar D-dimer levels (3.59 vs 3.39 ​μg/mL, p ​= ​0.65) compared to the second period (n ​= ​277). Lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon were preferentially given in the first period (23.8% and 32% vs 1.8% and 11.9%, p ​< ​0.0001). Use of corticoids (88.2% vs 87.4%, p ​= ​0,74) and tocilizumab (26.29 vs 20.22% p ​= ​0.06) were similarly administered in both periods. Patients in the second period needed less mechanical ventilation (4.9% vs 16.9%, p ​< ​0.0001), fewer ICU admission (6.1% vs 20.1%,p ​< ​0.0001) and showed similar mortality (17.7% vs 15.4%, p ​= ​0.43). Infectious and thrombotic complications were comparable in both periods (both around 8%, with no statistical difference). Patients treated with tocilizumab (n ​= ​163) had lower mortality rate compared to those untreated under the same indication (7.9% vs 24.2%, p ​< ​0.0001).
Conclusions: In this large retrospective COVID-19 in-hospital cohort, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon showed no significant impact on survival. Extensive use of corticosteroids and tocilizumab resulted in good overall outcome and showed acceptable complication rates.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Diagnosis; Epidemiology; Immunomodulation; SARS-CoV-2; Treatment.
 
Back
Top Bottom