tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J R Soc Med
. 2022 Jul 7;1410768221107119.
doi: 10.1177/01410768221107119. Online ahead of print.
SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 77,587 healthcare workers: a national observational longitudinal cohort study in Wales, United Kingdom, April to November 2020
Joe Hollinghurst[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura North[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tamas Szakmany[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Richard Pugh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Gwyneth A Davies[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shanya Sivakumaran[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rebecca Jarvis[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Martin Rolles[SUP] 5 [/SUP], W Owen Pickrell[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ashley Akbari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gareth Davies[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rowena Griffiths[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jane Lyons[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fatemeh Torabi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Fry[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mike B Gravenor[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ronan A Lyons[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: To better understand the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers, leading to recommendations for the prioritisation of personal protective equipment, testing, training and vaccination.
Design: Observational, longitudinal, national cohort study.
Setting: Our cohort were secondary care (hospital-based) healthcare workers employed by NHS Wales (United Kingdom) organisations from 1 April 2020 to 30 November 2020.
Participants: We included 577,756 monthly observations among 77,587 healthcare workers. Using linked anonymised datasets, participants were grouped into 20 staff roles. Additionally, each role was deemed either patient-facing, non-patient-facing or undetermined. This was linked to individual demographic details and dates of positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests.
Main outcome measures: We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to determine odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test.
Results: Patient-facing healthcare workers were at the highest risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection with an adjusted OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 2.28 (95% CI 2.10-2.47). We found that after adjustment, foundation year doctors (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.47-2.27]), healthcare support workers [OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.20-1.54]) and hospital nurses (OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.12-1.44]) were at the highest risk of infection among all staff groups. Younger healthcare workers and those living in more deprived areas were at a higher risk of infection. We also observed that infection rates varied over time and by organisation.
Conclusions: These findings have important policy implications for the prioritisation of vaccination, testing, training and personal protective equipment provision for patient-facing roles and the higher risk staff groups.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; healthcare workers; infection risk; public health.
. 2022 Jul 7;1410768221107119.
doi: 10.1177/01410768221107119. Online ahead of print.
SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 77,587 healthcare workers: a national observational longitudinal cohort study in Wales, United Kingdom, April to November 2020
Joe Hollinghurst[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura North[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tamas Szakmany[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Richard Pugh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Gwyneth A Davies[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shanya Sivakumaran[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rebecca Jarvis[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Martin Rolles[SUP] 5 [/SUP], W Owen Pickrell[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ashley Akbari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gareth Davies[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rowena Griffiths[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jane Lyons[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fatemeh Torabi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Fry[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mike B Gravenor[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ronan A Lyons[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35796183
- DOI: 10.1177/01410768221107119
Abstract
Objectives: To better understand the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers, leading to recommendations for the prioritisation of personal protective equipment, testing, training and vaccination.
Design: Observational, longitudinal, national cohort study.
Setting: Our cohort were secondary care (hospital-based) healthcare workers employed by NHS Wales (United Kingdom) organisations from 1 April 2020 to 30 November 2020.
Participants: We included 577,756 monthly observations among 77,587 healthcare workers. Using linked anonymised datasets, participants were grouped into 20 staff roles. Additionally, each role was deemed either patient-facing, non-patient-facing or undetermined. This was linked to individual demographic details and dates of positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests.
Main outcome measures: We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to determine odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test.
Results: Patient-facing healthcare workers were at the highest risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection with an adjusted OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 2.28 (95% CI 2.10-2.47). We found that after adjustment, foundation year doctors (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.47-2.27]), healthcare support workers [OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.20-1.54]) and hospital nurses (OR 1.27 [95% CI 1.12-1.44]) were at the highest risk of infection among all staff groups. Younger healthcare workers and those living in more deprived areas were at a higher risk of infection. We also observed that infection rates varied over time and by organisation.
Conclusions: These findings have important policy implications for the prioritisation of vaccination, testing, training and personal protective equipment provision for patient-facing roles and the higher risk staff groups.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; healthcare workers; infection risk; public health.