• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Psychiatr Res The Psychological Status of People Affected by the COVID-19 Outbreak in China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Psychiatr Res


. 2020 May 28;129:1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.05.026. Online ahead of print.
The Psychological Status of People Affected by the COVID-19 Outbreak in China


Zhen Zhu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qi Liu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xiaobing Jiang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Upasana Manandhar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Zhongyu Luo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Xu Zheng[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Yuanyuan Li[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Jun Xie[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Bo Zhang[SUP] 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: An outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan (Hubei, China) in December, 2019. Facing this largescale infectious public health event, everyone is under great psychological pressure. The aim was to investigate the psychological status of people affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in China.
Methods: The online cross-sectional study involving 922 participants (656 medical staff and 266 general population) was conducted in China between February and March, 2020. The psychological status was evaluated using the Symptom Check List 90 Revised (SCL-90). Linear and logistic regression analysis were used to examine the effect in the study.
Results: Of the 922 participants, approximately 18.3% had psychological health problems. The score of the SCL-90 was significant higher in medical staff (mean = 1.49) than that in general population (mean = 1.36). In addition, the participants enrolled in March were less likely to have psychological health problems than in February (odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30 to 0.59). Female had a 1.44-fold risk of psychological health problems than male (95% CI = 1.01 to 2.03).
Conclusions: In the study, 18.3% had psychological health problems during the outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic. With the remission of the epidemic, the psychological health status of participants has been improved. Medical staff were likely to have higher SCL-90 scores than general population and female had more psychological problems than male. Our findings can be used to formulate psychological interventions for improving the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Epidemics; Medical staff; Psychological health.
 
Back
Top Bottom