• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Oral Biosci . Oral SARS-CoV-2 inoculation leads to distinct viral distribution compared to nasal inoculation in a Syrian hamster model

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Oral Biosci


. 2026 Feb;68(1):100746.
doi: 10.1016/j.job.2026.100746. Epub 2026 Jan 22.
Oral SARS-CoV-2 inoculation leads to distinct viral distribution compared to nasal inoculation in a Syrian hamster model

Nao Gojo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yu Usami[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Katsutoshi Hirose[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Satoru Toyosawa[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shintaro Shichinohe[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Tokiko Watanabe[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Chikako Ono[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Tsuyoshi Inoue[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Takayoshi Sakai[SUP] 9 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Objectives: The nose and mouth are the primary entry points for upper respiratory severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; however, the influence of different entry routes on viral spread remains unclear. Oral and nasal infection routes in terms of viral distribution and presence of inflammation were compared.
Methods: Syrian hamsters were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 via three routes: nasal inoculation (NI), simulating conventional upper respiratory infection; lingual (supra-lingual) inoculation (LI), simulating exposure during speaking and eating; and sublingual inoculation (SI), simulating exposure to the salivary glands. After three days, the lungs, submandibular glands, nasal turbinates, liver, and brain were examined histologically and immunohistochemically. To assess direct access to the lungs, India ink was administered via each route and analyzed after tissue clearing.
Results: NI resulted in infection in the nasal olfactory sensory epithelium of the nasal cavity and in the lungs. India ink studies suggest that the virus is likely to have infected the nasal mucosa first, followed by secondary infection of the lungs. LI resulted in marked infection of the submandibular glands with vascular involvement. In the LI and SI groups, no viral antigen was detected in the lungs; however, there was inflammation of the lungs, suggesting cytokine-mediated effects.
Conclusion: Different upper respiratory entry routes produced distinct pathological patterns. While nasal infection is well recognized, our findings indicate that salivary gland infection via SI may suggest an alternative pathway for systemic viral dissemination.

Keywords: Animal model; COVID19; Infection; SARS-CoV-2; Salivary gland.

 
Back
Top