• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Obstet Gynaecol Res . No significant changes in preterm birth, low-birth-weight, and small-for-gestational-age infants during the first year of th

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Obstet Gynaecol Res


. 2022 Oct 9.
doi: 10.1111/jog.15446. Online ahead of print.
No significant changes in preterm birth, low-birth-weight, and small-for-gestational-age infants during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in a rural area in Japan


Yohei Maki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Atsuko Tokuda[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emi Kino[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aya Yamauchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Teruo Ohtsuka[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kiminari Terao[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic's impact on pregnancy outcomes in a Japanese rural area.
Methods: This retrospective study focused on the periods between March 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021 (during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic), and January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Singleton pregnancies delivered at or after 22 gestational weeks were included. Preterm delivery, low-birth-weight, and small-for-gestational-age infant rates during the pandemic were compared to those in the preceding 3 years.
Results: In the pandemic and control groups, 1650 and 5762 pregnant women were included, respectively. Two pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 were identified (0.1%). There were no significant intergroup differences in preterm delivery rates (control, 4% vs. pandemic, 3.3%; difference: -0.7% [95% confidence interval: -1.7%-0.3%], p = 0.22). The low-birth-weight rate tended to decrease; however, the difference was insignificant (7.9% vs. 6.5%; difference: -1.4% [95% confidence interval: -2.8-0%], p = 0.06). The small-for-gestational-age infant rate was significantly lower in the pandemic than in the control group (7.3% vs. 5.2%; difference: -2.1% [95% confidence interval: -3.3-0.8%], p < 0.01). However, the interrupted time series analysis showed no significant trend.
Conclusions: There were no significant changes in the rates of preterm delivery, low-birth-weight infants, and small-for-gestational-age infants during the pandemic's first year compared to those in the preceding 3 years. Behavioral changes, such as "stay-at-home" measures, may not improve pregnancy outcomes in Japan.

Keywords: COVID-19; low-birth-weight infants; pregnancy; preterm delivery; small-for-date infants.
 
Back
Top Bottom