• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Structural Adaptability of IgA and IgM Supports Broad SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralization

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2026 Jan;98(1):e70790.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.70790.
Structural Adaptability of IgA and IgM Supports Broad SARS-CoV-2 Variant Neutralization

Yalcin Pisil[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hisatoshi Shida[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sandra Morales Ruiz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kyunghak Cho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Metehan Gungor[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Zafer Yazici[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tomoyuki Miura[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Neutralizing emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants requires antibodies effective not only against epitope mutations but also under variable antigenic presentations. We assessed the neutralization capacity of the same anti-RBD monoclonal antibody (8A5) expressed as IgG, IgA, or IgM against 18 variants, identifying three neutralization classes: variants susceptible to all isotypes, variants resistant to IgG but sensitive to IgA/IgM, and variants resistant to all isotypes. Mutation analysis revealed that S371L-S373P-S375F disrupted IgG binding while partially preserving IgA/IgM activity, whereas L371F induced conformational changes abolishing all antibody interactions. Notably, some variants lacking these mutations still escaped IgG, suggesting geometric factors contribute to differential efficacy. To explore this, we performed negative-stain electron microscopy, which showed heterogeneous spike distributions across virion surfaces. ELISA assays with decreasing spike concentrations revealed that IgG binding declined sharply under low antigen density, while IgA and IgM maintained strong binding, reflecting their extended architecture and multivalency. These findings indicate that spatial adaptability, in addition to affinity, contributes to effective neutralization. IgA and IgM can engage antigens under sparse or conformationally altered conditions, suggesting potential advantages over IgG against certain variants. These insights may support the rational design of IgA- and IgM-based antibody therapeutics, highlighting their potential role in combating SARS-CoV-2 variants and other emerging viral pathogens.

Keywords: IgA; IgG; IgM; SARS‐CoV‐2; mAb; neutralization.

 
Back
Top