• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Pulse versus Non-pulse Steroid Regimens in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2022 May 3.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27824. Online ahead of print.
Pulse versus Non-pulse Steroid Regimens in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


Waleed Khokher[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Azizullah Beran[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Saffa Iftikhar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Saif-Eddin Malhas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Omar Srour[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohammed Mhanna[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sapan Bhuta[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dipen Patel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nithin Kesireddy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cameron Burmeister[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elizabeth Borchers[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ragheb Assaly[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Fadi Safi[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Systemic steroids are associated with reduced mortality in hypoxic patients with COVID-19. However, there is no consensus on the doses of steroid therapy in these patients. Several studies showed that pulse dose steroids (PDS) could reduce the progression of COVID-19 pneumonia. However, data regarding the role of PDS in COVID-19 is still unclear. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the role of PDS in COVID-19 patients compared to non-pulse steroids (NPDS).
Methods: Comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception through February 10, 2022 was performed for all published studies comparing PDS to NPDS therapy to manage hypoxic patients with COVID-19. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were the need for endotracheal intubation, hospital length of stay (LOS), and adverse events in the form of superimposed infections.
Results: A total of ten observational studies involving 3065 patients (1289 patients received PDS and 1776 received NPDS) were included. The mortality rate was similar between PDS and NPDS groups (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.92-1.65, P=0.16). There were no differences in the need for endotracheal intubation (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.37-1.137, P=0.31), LOS (MD 1.93 days; 95% CI -1.46, 5.33; P=0.26), or adverse events (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.56-1.57, P = 0.80) between the two groups.
Conclusion: Compared to NPDS, PDS was associated with similar mortality rates, need for endotracheal intubation, LOS, and adverse events. Given the observational nature of the included studies, randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our findings. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: COVID-19; Pulse dose steroids; corticosteroids; hospital stay.; intubation; mortality.
 
Back
Top Bottom