• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Modeling Antibody Kinetics Post-mRNA Booster Vaccination and Protection Durations Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2025 Aug;97(8):e70521.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.70521. Modeling Antibody Kinetics Post-mRNA Booster Vaccination and Protection Durations Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Luis J Ponce[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yuqian Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ananya Singh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hoong Kai Chua[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marc Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pei Xiang Hor[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chiew Yee Loh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xuan Ying Poh[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Suma Rao[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Po Ying Chia[SUP] 1 4 5 [/SUP], Sean W X Ong[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Tau Hong Lee[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Ray J H Lin[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Clarissa Lim[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jefanie Teo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yun Shan Goh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Keisuke Ejima[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP]; on behalf of the NCID Study Group; on behalf of the COVID‐19 Cohort Study Group



Affiliations
Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels post-booster vaccination is important to inform their durations of protection. Longitudinal antibody data was collected on the day of booster vaccination, as well as 28, 180, and 360 days after. Using nonlinear mixed effects models, we mapped the kinetics of binding IgA and IgG against wild-type (WT) and Omicron BA.1 spike proteins. Furthermore, we analyzed the association between antibody levels and risk of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infection through survival analyzes, and predicted durations of protection against infection. We found that the antibody response waned more rapidly following the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 booster compared to the Moderna mRNA-1273 booster. However, individuals boosted with the Pfizer vaccine exhibited a steeper rebound in antibody levels after infection. Faster postinfection antibody growth rates were observed in the elderly, females, and those with late infections. High antibody levels for WT IgG and BA.1 IgA at day 28 post-booster were associated with reduced infection risk; hazard ratios were 0.47 (95% CI [0.22, 0.98]) and 0.36 (95% CI [0.17, 0.78]), respectively, compared to low levels. Time-varying antibody levels showed better survival model fits. At medium COVID-19 case incidence (621 cases per million per day), a binding BA.1 IgA response of at least 20% is needed to sustain 80% protection against infection over 155 days post-booster. Our estimates of protection durations against SARS-CoV-2 infection post-booster vaccination may help inform the ideal frequency of boosters.

Keywords: COVID‐19 breakthrough infections; COVID‐19 vaccines; SARS‐CoV‐2; immunoglobulin A; immunoglobulin G; survival analysis.

 
Back
Top Bottom