• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Longitudinal detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses with different serological methods

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2021 Jun 1.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27113. Online ahead of print.
Longitudinal detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses with different serological methods


Petra Emmerich[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ronald von Possel[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Christoph Josef Hemmer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carlos Fritzsche[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hilte Geerdes-Fenge[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Babett Menge[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Claudia Messing[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Viola Borchardt-Lohölter[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christina Deschermeier[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Katja Steinhagen[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Serological testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is used to detect ongoing or past SARS-CoV-2 infections. To study the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and to assess the diagnostic performances of eight serological assays, we used 129 serum samples collected on known days post symptom onset (dpso) from 42 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 and 54 serum samples from healthy blood donors, and children infected with seasonal coronaviruses. The sera were analyzed for the presence of IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence testing (IIFT) based on SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. They were further tested for antibodies against the S1 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (IgG, IgA) and against the viral nucleocapsid protein (IgG, IgM) using ELISAs. The assay specificities were 94.4%-100%. The sensitivities varied largely between assays, reflecting their respective purposes. The sensitivities of IgA and IgM assays were highest between 11 and 20 dpso, whereas the sensitivities of IgG assays peaked between 20 and 60 dpso. IIFT showed highest sensitivities due to the use of the whole SARS-CoV-2 as substrate and provided information on whether or not the individual has been infected with SARS-CoV-2. ELISAs provided further information about both the prevalence and concentration of specific antibodies against selected antigens of SARS-CoV-2. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: COVID-19; ELISA; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; immunofluorescence; serology.
 
Back
Top Bottom