• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon-beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon-beta in moderately ill patients wi

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2022 Mar 16.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.27724. Online ahead of print.
Efficacy and safety of favipiravir plus interferon-beta versus lopinavir/ritonavir plus interferon-beta in moderately ill patients with covid-19: a randomized clinical trial


Mehdi Hassaniazad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hossein Farshidi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Abdollah Gharibzadeh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ali Bazram[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elham Khalili[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Afsaneh Noormandi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mohammad Fathalipour[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Favipiravir (FVP), Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV), and Interferon-beta (INF-beta) are considered as potential treatments for COVID-19. We examined the efficacy and safety of FVP and INF-beta compared to LPV/RTV and INF-beta combinations for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. It was a single-center randomized clinical trial.
Methods: Eligible patients were randomized to receive FVP plus INF-beta versus LPV/RTV plus INF-beta. The primary endpoint was the viral clearance after seven days of randomization. ICU admission, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, in-hospital mortality, and the incidence of adverse events were also measured. This trial was registered on the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200506047323N3).
Results: Patients were randomly allocated to the FVP (n=33) and LPV/RTV (n=33) groups. The viral clearance on day seven was not significantly different between the FVP (31.1%) and the LPV/RTV group (16.1%). The rate of ICU admission and likewise the in-hospital mortality in the FVP group (12.5% and 6.3%, respectively) were similar to the LPV/RTV groups (19.4% and 19.4%, respectively). Median LOS in the hospital was also not different (6.8 days [IQR=5.0-11.0] in the FVP and (8.0 days [IQR=5.5-12.5]) in LPV/RTV groups (p=0.140). Adverse events were observed in 25.0% of FVP and 32.3% of LPV/RTV groups.
Conclusion: The combination therapy with FVP did not exert a higher efficacy compared to the combination regimen of LPV/RTV. However, both treatment regimens demonstrated a mild profile of adverse events. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Antiviral agents; Interferon; SARS-coronavirus.
 
Back
Top Bottom