• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol A Comparative Study on the Time to Achieve Negative Nucleic Acid Testing and Hospital Stays Between Danoprevir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir i

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2020 Jun 5.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.26141. Online ahead of print.
A Comparative Study on the Time to Achieve Negative Nucleic Acid Testing and Hospital Stays Between Danoprevir and Lopinavir/Ritonavir in the Treatment of Patients With COVID-19


Zhicheng Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shumei Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xianglin Tu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xuping Peng[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yanxia Huang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Li Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Weihua Ju[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jianfeng Rao[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xue Li[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Donghong Zhu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Huabao Sun[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hongyi Chen[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: In late December 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first outbroke in Wuhan city, China, and has now become a global pandemic. However, there is no specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19.
Methods: This study enrolled 33 COVID-19 patients in the nineth hospital of Nanchang from January 27[SUP]th[/SUP] to February 24[SUP]th[/SUP] , 2020. Clinical indexes of patients upon admission/discharge were examined. Patients were divided into two groups according to different treatment plans (Danoprevir; Lopinavir/Ritonavir). The days to achieve negative nucleic acid testing and the days of hospital stays were counted and statistically analyzed.
Results: COVID-19 patients treated with Danoprevir or Lopinavir/Ritonavir were all improved and discharged. Indexes like blood routine, inflammation and immune-related indexes were significantly recovered after treatment. Additionally, under the circumstance that there was no significant difference in patients' general information between the two groups, we found that the mean time to achieve negative nucleic acid testing and hospital stays of patients treated with Danoprevir both were significantly shorter than those of patients with Lopinavir/Ritonavir.
Conclusion: Collectively, applying Danoprevir is a good treatment plan for COVID-19 patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: COVID-19; Danoprevir; Lopinavir/Ritonavir; time to achieve negative nucleic acid testing.
 
Back
Top Bottom