• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Internet Res . Understanding How and by Whom COVID-19 Misinformation is Spread on Social Media: Coding and Network Analyses

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Internet Res


. 2022 Jun 7.
doi: 10.2196/37623. Online ahead of print.
Understanding How and by Whom COVID-19 Misinformation is Spread on Social Media: Coding and Network Analyses


Yuehua Zhao[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sicheng Zhu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Qiang Wan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tianyi Li[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chun Zou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hao Wang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sanhong Deng[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: During global health crises, such as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, rapid spread of misinformation on social media has occurred. The misinformation associated with COVID-19 has been analyzed, but little attention has been paid to developing a comprehensive analytical framework to study its spread on social media.
Objective: We propose an elaboration likelihood model-based theoretical model to understand the persuasion process of COVID-19-related misinformation on social media.
Methods: The proposed model incorporated the central route feature (content feature) and peripheral features (including creator authority, social proof, and emotion). The central-level COVID-19-related misinformation feature included five topics: medical information, social issues and people's livelihoods, government response, epidemic spread, and international issues. First, we created a dataset of COVID-19 pandemic-related misinformation based on fact-checking sources and a dataset of posts that contained this misinformation on real-world social media. Based on the collected posts, we analyzed the dissemination patterns.
Results: Our dataset included 11,450 misinformation posts, with medical misinformation as the largest category (5,359; 46.8 %). Moreover, the results suggest that both the least (4,660/11,301; 41.2 %) and most (2,320/11301; 20.5 %) active users are prone to sharing misinformation. Further, posts related to international topics that have the greatest chance of producing a profound and lasting impact on social media possess the highest distribution depth (depthmax=14) and width (widthmax=2,355). Additionally, 97% (2,364/2,437) of the spread is characterized by radiation dissemination.
Conclusions: Our proposed model and findings could help to combat the spread of misinformation by detecting suspicious users and identifying propagation characteristics.
 
Back
Top Bottom