• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med . Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID 19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med


. 2022 Mar 13;1-17.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2051008. Online ahead of print.
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID 19: a systematic review and meta-analysis


Faustino R Pérez-López[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Peter Chedraui[SUP] 4 [/SUP], María T López-Baena[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gonzalo Pérez-Roncero[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Sanz-Arenal[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Marta Narváez-Salazar[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Peña Dieste-Pérez[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP], Mauricio Tajada[SUP] 1 2 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed at comparing obstetric and perinatal outcomes in laboratory-tested pregnant women for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection before delivering.
Method: We performed a comprehensive systematic review of electronic databases for studies reporting pregnant women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection, as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before delivery, during the pandemic period published up to June 25, 2021. Results are reported as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: Seventeen observational studies with low to moderate risk of bias, reported on 2,769 pregnant women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test and 13,807 with a negative test. Pregnant women with a positive PCR test delivered at an earlier gestational age (MD -0.19; 95% CI -0.36 to -0.02 weeks), smoked less (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.94) and were associated with higher odds for preeclampsia (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.09-1.54), NICU admissions (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.18-4.76), stillbirths (OR 2.70; 95% CI, 1.38-5.29), and perinatal mortality (OR 3.23; 95% CI 1.23-8.52). There were no significant differences between positive and negative tested women in terms of nulliparity, multiple pregnancies, gestational diabetes, route of delivery, labor induction, preterm birth, infant birth weight, 5 min Apgar scores < 7, small-for-gestational-age infants and fetal malformations. Eleven studies included neonatal PCR SARS-CoV-2 testing which was performed on 129 infants, of which 20 were positive.
Conclusion: Positive SARS-CoV-2 tested pregnant women had higher odds for preeclampsia/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, NICU admissions, stillbirths and perinatal mortality.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; meta-analysis; perinatal mortality; preeclampsia; preterm birth.
 
Back
Top Bottom