• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Korean Med Sci . Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Booster Vaccine Against COVID-19 in Korea

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Korean Med Sci


. 2024 Jan 22;39(3):e15.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e15. Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Booster Vaccine Against COVID-19 in Korea

Jin Gu Yoon[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jang Wook Sohn[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Won Suk Choi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Seong-Heon Wie[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jacob Lee[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jin-Soo Lee[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Hye Won Jeong[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Joong Sik Eom[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hye Seong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Eliel Nham[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Yu Jung Choi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ji Yun Noh[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Joon Young Song[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hee Jin Cheong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Woo Joo Kim[SUP] 1 10 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Bivalent booster mRNA vaccines containing the omicron-variant strains have been introduced worldwide in the autumn of 2022. Nevertheless, the omicron subvariants evoked another large coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave in late 2022 and early 2023.
Methods: A retrospective, test-negative, case-control study was conducted to estimate the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of bivalent COVID-19 vaccines in 8 university hospitals between January and February 2023. The case and control groups were divided based on nasopharyngeal COVID-19 real-time polymerase chain reaction results and matched based on age, sex, hospital, and date (week) of the test performed. The VE of the BA.1- or BA.4/BA.5-based mRNA vaccines were estimated. VE was calculated using the 1-adjusted odds ratio from multivariable logistic regression.
Results: In total, 949 patients and 947 controls were enrolled in this study. VE for the BA.4/BA.5-based bivalent mRNA vaccine was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17, 61%). In subgroup analysis based on age and underlying medical conditions, BA.4/BA.5-based bivalent mRNA vaccine was effective against old adults aged ≥ 65-years (VE, 55%; 95% CI, 23, 73%) and individuals with comorbidities (VE, 54%; 95% CI, 23, 73%). In comparison, the BA.1-based bivalent mRNA vaccine did not demonstrate statistically significant effectiveness (VE, 25%; 95% CI, -8, 49%).
Conclusion: The BA.4/BA.5-based bivalent mRNA booster vaccine provided significant protection against COVID-19 in the Korean adults, especially in the older adults aged ≥ 65 years and in individuals with underlying medical conditions.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant; Vaccine Efficacy; mRNA Vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom