• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Int Med Res . Clinical implications of different specimen types for nucleic acid testing in two cases of COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Int Med Res


. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520949067.
doi: 10.1177/0300060520949067.
Clinical implications of different specimen types for nucleic acid testing in two cases of COVID-19


Hengwei Fan[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Xiaqing Yu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xiaohui Fu[SUP] 2 4 [/SUP], Hengmei Zhu[SUP] 2 5 [/SUP], Zhongwei Lv[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wanwan Yi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Qian Zhang[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test is currently the gold standard for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This disease requires high-quality viral nucleic acid tests, and selecting the type of specimen from patients, who are at different disease stages, to use in the nucleic acid test is challenging. This article reports in detail the diagnosis and treatment process for two patients with confirmed COVID-19 and analyzes the results of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests that were used for different types of specimens (sputum from deep cough, nasopharyngeal swab, and feces). The nucleic acid testing results of sputum from deep cough showed the best performance for positive detection. Our findings provide a reference for selecting the most suitable specimen for the clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 and improving the positive detection rate.

Keywords: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; case report; clinical specimens; coronavirus disease 2019; nucleic acid test; positive detection rate.
 
Back
Top Bottom