• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect . The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-a

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect


. 2024 May 23;89(1):106187.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106187. Online ahead of print. The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials

Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Rebecca C Harris[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jason K H Lee[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Marine Dufournet[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Orly Vardeny[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Alexander Peikert[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Brian Claggett[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 10 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Objectives: To summarize current evidence of high-dose influenza vaccine (HD-IV) vs standard-dose (SD-IV) regarding severe clinical outcomes.
Methods: A prespecified meta-analysis was conducted to assess relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IV vs SD-IV in reducing the rates of (1) pneumonia and influenza (P&I) hospitalization, (2) all hospitalizations, and (3) all-cause death in adults ≥ 65 years in randomized controlled trials. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using fixed-effects models with the inverse variance method.
Results: Five randomized trials were included encompassing 105,685 individuals. HD-IV vs SD-IV reduced P&I hospitalizations (rVE: 23.5 %, [95 %CI: 12.3 to 33.2]). HD-IV vs SD-IV also reduced rate of all-cause hospitalizations (rVE: 7.3 %, [95 %CI: 4.5 to 10.0]). No significant differences were observed in death rates (rVE = 1.6 % ([95 %CI: -2.0 to 5.0]) in HD-IV vs SD-IV. Sensitivity analyses omitting trials with participants sharing the same comorbidity, trials with ≥ 100 events, and random-effects models provided comparable estimates for all outcomes.
Conclusions: HD-IV reduced the incidence of P&I and all-cause hospitalization vs SD-IV in adults ≥ 65 years in randomized trials, through no significant difference was observed in all-cause death rates. These findings, supported by evidence from several randomized studies, can benefit from replication in a fully powered, individually randomized trial.

Keywords: High-dose influenza vaccine; Meta-analysis; Randomized trials; Severe clinical endpoints.

 
Back
Top Bottom