• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect . Sensitivity and specificity of surveillance case definitions in detection of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus among hospitalized

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect


. 2021 Dec 22;S0163-4453(21)00635-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.12.012. Online ahead of print.
Sensitivity and specificity of surveillance case definitions in detection of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus among hospitalized patients, New Zealand, 2012-2016


William Davis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jazmin Duque[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Q Sue Huang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Natalie Olson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cameron C Grant[SUP] 4 [/SUP], E Claire Newbern[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mark Thompson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ben Waite[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Namrata Prasad[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Adrian Trenholme[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The WHO is exploring the value of adding RSV testing to existing influenza surveillance systems to inform RSV control programs. We evaluate the usefulness of four commonly used influenza surveillance case-definitions for influenza and RSV surveillance.
Methods: SHIVERS, a multi-institutional collaboration, conducted surveillance for influenza and RSV in four New Zealand hospitals. Nurses reviewed admission logs, enrolled patients with suspected acute respiratory infections (ARI), and obtained nasopharyngeal swabs for RT-PCR. We compared the performance characteristics for identifying laboratory-confirmed influenza and RSV severe acute respiratory infection (SARI), defined as persons admitted with measured or reported fever and cough within 10 days of illness, to three other case definitions: 1. reported fever and cough or shortness of breath, 2. cough and shortness of breath, or 3. cough.
Results: During April-September 2012-2016, SHIVERS identified 16,055 admissions with ARI; of 6374 cases consented and tested for influenza or RSV, 5437 (85%) had SARI and 937 (15%) did not. SARI had the highest specificity in detecting influenza (40.6%) and RSV (40.8%) but the lowest sensitivity (influenza 78.8%, RSV 60.3%) among patients of all ages. Cough or shortness of breath had the highest sensitivity (influenza 99.3%, RSV 99.9%) but the lowest specificity (influenza 1.6%, RSV 1.9%). SARI sensitivity among children aged <3 months was 60.8% for influenza and 43.6% for RSV-both lower than in other age groups.
Conclusions: While SARI had the highest specificity, its sensitivity was limited, especially among children aged <3 months. Cough or shortness of breath was the most sensitive.

Keywords: New Zealand; Respiratory syncytial virus; SHIVERS; WHO; case definition; clinical; influenza; symptoms.
 
Back
Top Bottom