• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Public Health . The prevalence of adverse reactions among individuals with three-dose COVID-19 vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Public Health


. 2022 Dec 6;16(1):125-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.12.004. Online ahead of print.
The prevalence of adverse reactions among individuals with three-dose COVID-19 vaccination


Yuying Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yujie Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Meng Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Xiaoyu Zhang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Haibin Li[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Youxin Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wei Wang[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jianguang Ji[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Lijuan Wu[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Deqiang Zheng[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Considering the adverse reactions to vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), some people, particularly the elderly and those with underlying medical conditions, are hesitant to be vaccinated. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of adverse reactions and provide direct evidence of vaccine safety, mainly for the elderly and people with underlying medical conditions, to receive COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods: From 1st March to 30th April 2022, we conducted an online survey of people who had completed three doses of COVID-19 vaccination by convenience sampling. Adverse reaction rates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. In addition, conditional logistic regression was used to compare the differences in adverse reactions among the elderly and those with underlying medical conditions with the general population.
Results: A total of 3339 individuals were included in this study, of which 2335 (69.9%) were female, with an average age of 32.1 ± 11.4 years. The prevalence of adverse reactions after the first dose of inactivated vaccine was 24.6% (23.1-26.2%), 19.2% (17.8-20.7%) for the second dose, and 19.1% (17.7-20.6%) for the booster dose; among individuals using messenger RNA vaccines, the prevalence was 42.7% (32.3-53.6%) for the first dose, 47.2% (36.5-58.1%) for the second dose, and 46.1% (35.4-57.0%) for the booster dose. Compared with the general population, the prevalence of adverse events did not differ in individuals with underlying medical conditions and those aged 60 and above.
Conclusions: For individuals with underlying medical conditions and those aged 60 and above, the prevalence of adverse reactions is similar to that of the general population, which provides a scientific basis regarding vaccination safety for these populations.

Keywords: Adverse reactions; Booster dose; COVID-19 vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; Special populations.
 
Back
Top Bottom