tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Public Health
. 2023 Jun 10;16(8):1306-1312.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.006. Online ahead of print. Screening Hesitancy of a Universal Voluntary-based Rapid Antigen Test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) During Omicron Wave in Hong Kong
Eliza Lai-Yi Wong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hong Qiu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kailu Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kai-Sing Sun[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Annie Wai-Ling Cheung[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eng-Kiong Yeoh[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: The Hong Kong government distributed rapid antigen test (RAT) kits to households across the city and called for a universal voluntary testing exercise for three consecutive days during the Omicron wave to identify infected persons early for quarantine and disrupt transmission chains in the community. We conducted a survey to evaluate the participation rates and explore the determinants of voluntary RAT adoption and hesitancy.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted through computer-assisted telephone interviews from 19 May to 16 June 2022 using an overlapping dual-frame telephone number sampling design. Information on willingness to adopt voluntary RAT, four themes of personal qualities, attitudes toward the government's health policies, incentives to motivate RAT adoption, and personal sociodemographic factors were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors associated with RAT adoption.
Results: Of the 1010 participants, 490 successfully responded to the fixed-line and 520 to the mobile phone survey, with response rates of 1.42% and 1.63% and screen hesitancy rates of 36.1% and 39.3%, respectively. Participants of adoption RAT were those aged 30-49 years, with high perceived COVID-19 infection severity, ≥ 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccination, and more agreement with the health policies on material resources and quarantine orders. Individuals who were less risk seeking and more altruistic reported a higher adoption of voluntary RAT.
Conclusions: Understanding the willingness to participate in a voluntary universal testing programme might shed light on effective ways to minimise screening hesitancy in future public health strategies and campaigns.
Keywords: COVID-19 screening; Cross-sectional survey; Screening hesitancy; Voluntary rapid antigen test.
. 2023 Jun 10;16(8):1306-1312.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.006. Online ahead of print. Screening Hesitancy of a Universal Voluntary-based Rapid Antigen Test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) During Omicron Wave in Hong Kong
Eliza Lai-Yi Wong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hong Qiu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kailu Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kai-Sing Sun[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carrie Ho-Kwan Yam[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Annie Wai-Ling Cheung[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Eng-Kiong Yeoh[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37336128
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.006
Background: The Hong Kong government distributed rapid antigen test (RAT) kits to households across the city and called for a universal voluntary testing exercise for three consecutive days during the Omicron wave to identify infected persons early for quarantine and disrupt transmission chains in the community. We conducted a survey to evaluate the participation rates and explore the determinants of voluntary RAT adoption and hesitancy.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted through computer-assisted telephone interviews from 19 May to 16 June 2022 using an overlapping dual-frame telephone number sampling design. Information on willingness to adopt voluntary RAT, four themes of personal qualities, attitudes toward the government's health policies, incentives to motivate RAT adoption, and personal sociodemographic factors were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the factors associated with RAT adoption.
Results: Of the 1010 participants, 490 successfully responded to the fixed-line and 520 to the mobile phone survey, with response rates of 1.42% and 1.63% and screen hesitancy rates of 36.1% and 39.3%, respectively. Participants of adoption RAT were those aged 30-49 years, with high perceived COVID-19 infection severity, ≥ 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccination, and more agreement with the health policies on material resources and quarantine orders. Individuals who were less risk seeking and more altruistic reported a higher adoption of voluntary RAT.
Conclusions: Understanding the willingness to participate in a voluntary universal testing programme might shed light on effective ways to minimise screening hesitancy in future public health strategies and campaigns.
Keywords: COVID-19 screening; Cross-sectional survey; Screening hesitancy; Voluntary rapid antigen test.