• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Public Health . Re-evaluation of Retested Nucleic Acid-Positive Cases in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Report From a Designated Transfer Ho

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Public Health


. 2020 Jun 7;S1876-0341(20)30502-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.008. Online ahead of print.
Re-evaluation of Retested Nucleic Acid-Positive Cases in Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Report From a Designated Transfer Hospital in Chongqing, China


Yan Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Weizhi Bai[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Bin Liu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jian Huang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Irakoze Laurent[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Feng Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wuquan Deng[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiaoqiu Xiao[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China [1], a large number of confirmed cases met the discharge criteria (one of which is two consecutive negative nucleic acid tests with an interval of at least 24 h) [2]. Previous studies have paid more attention to the epidemic situation of COVID-19 and patient diagnosis and treatment. Close attention also should be paid to the discharged patients. Surprisingly, a previous follow-up reported that some patients' nucleic acid retest results were positive again after discharge [3]. Factors impacting these follow-up test results should be further investigated. Since the first confirmed case was diagnosed in our hospital (Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, the designated transfer hospital) on February 4th, we confirmed a total of 17 cases. All patients infected with the novel coronavirus were transferred to a designated hospital in Southwest China's Chongqing by ambulance with an inbuilt negative-pressure chamber [4]. In the follow-up examination of these patients, RT-PCR tests were conducted again 3 days after discharged from the designated hospital. Four patients showed recurrence of positive results after a few days of discharge. Thus, we examined these cases herein, aiming to provide information for policy formulation and modification of discharge plans.

Keywords: COVID-19; Nucleic acid; Positive; Retest.
 
Back
Top Bottom