• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis . The effect of pre-existing coronavirus antibodies on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes in exposed household members

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis


. 2025 Apr 4:jiaf172.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaf172. Online ahead of print. The effect of pre-existing coronavirus antibodies on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes in exposed household members

Ilse Westerhof[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Reina Sikkema[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ganna Rozhnova[SUP] 1 3 4 5 [/SUP], Janko van Beek[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marion Koopmans[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Patricia Bruijning-Verhagen[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background/rationale: We investigated the effect of pre-existing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal human coronaviruses on infection outcomes in Omicron BA1/2 exposed household members from January to March 2022.
Methods: Data from a prospective household study in the Netherlands were used including 63 households with 195 household members exposed to a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA1/2 index case. The protocol included repeated nose-throat swab and saliva RT-PCR testing, paired serology, and self-reported daily symptom scoring by household members. Infection outcomes included the occurrence of secondary infections, symptom burden, and CT-value trajectories. We studied the effect of baseline binding antibody levels for SARS-CoVs and seasonal coronaviruses (hCoV) NL63, 229E, HKU1 and OC43 spike protein, on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes.
Results: 132 of 195 (68%) exposed household members developed a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among exposed household members, higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 at baseline were associated with a reduced risk of secondary infection (adjusted Odds ratio 0.73; 95% Confidence interval 0.55-0.99). No significant differences between antibody levels and symptom burden or CT-value trajectories were observed.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that prior SARS-CoV-2 antibodies provide some protection against Omicron BA.1/BA.2 infection, while effects on symptom burden or CT-value could not be demonstrated. The results highlight the relatively limited, but not negligible role of cross-protective antibodies, especially when facing immune escape variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: (Seasonal) Coronavirus antibodies; CT-value trajectories; Disease outcomes; Infection risk; SARS-CoV-2.

 
Back
Top Bottom